Huh? :unsure:Danscraftbeer said:Letting the wort settle over night then taking a reading can lead to a miss reading. Sugars can sink post wort but they seem to float pre boil?
This is why refractometers are labelled "auto temp correction" or ATC.RdeVjun said:Klangers is spot on.
Alt method: Sample in a glass pipette or eyedropper, cool, on to refractometer, bingo.
Your refracto won't stay ambient very long if it keeps equalising with hot wort.Lionman said:This is why refractometers are labelled "auto temp correction" or ATC.
The sample is so small that the temp equalises with the refractometer almost instantly. It's more important to have your refractometer at the right temp, especially if you brew outside. If the device is at an ambient 10 degrees you will get a different reading compared to an ambient of 35.
I'm not sure about your technique, but I can't see the possibility of my refractometer moving even a fraction of a degree Celsius when I take readings. The refractometer is a solid hunk of stainless steel and glass - weighing in at 275g. I take samples using a pipette and the two drops of wort required to get a reading would be less than 500mg. Once the drops are on the glass, I put the cover on and take a reading straight away. You are not doing anything silly, like dunking the instrument in hot wort, are you?klangers said:Your refracto won't stay ambient very long if it keeps equalising with hot wort.
klangers said:Whatever works for you to get a reliable and repeatable measurement.
Enter your email address to join: