wide eyed and legless
Well-Known Member
I think the whole of the opposition should go and keep him company then, they could unify in the corner.
I'd prefer Julian Clary to Jason Clare to lead the ALPbrowndog said:Shorten or Albanese? bit of a rock and a hard place if you ask me. I'd like to see Jason Clare leading the ALP, he seems like a straightforward no bullshit kind of person.
I don't know Liam. Policies have not really changed since the election, they haven't had time to make any noticable changes and Parliament doesn't meet for another few weeks yet. You're probably right, people think things are better, but then sometimes that's all it takes - a different attitude and a renewed level of confidence. I'm not anti-Labor but sit slightly to the right generally. The Gillard/Rudd thing wasn't good for Labor, the country or consumer confidence. It hurt small business big time with a lot going out of business. We had a world-wide recession and are well aware of that but the last complex, messy administration made it much worse in Australia than it needed to be IMHO.Liam_snorkel said:Has anything policy-wise changed that affected your business since the election, or was it more a change in confidence from your clients/customers. People believe things are better, therefore they are?
Not a personal attack Manticle but the above statement gets on my wick.manticle said:Things in AU were pretty good compared to the rest of the world under Rudd/Gillard.
By that comparison we are doing very poorly in my books.TasChris said:The comparison should always be "how is Australia going compared to how we should or could be going".
keep in mind the context was Labels' statement "We had a world-wide recession and are well aware of that but the last complex, messy administration made it much worse in Australia than it needed to be"TasChris said:Not a personal attack Manticle but the above statement gets on my wick.
I don't care how Australia is going compared to the rest of the world or any other grab sample of countries.
The comparison should always be "how is Australia going compared to how we should or could be going".
Either side of politics will always find a country as an example that proves their point of view. ie we are going much better than Botswana or we are not going as well as Germany
Was Australia going as well as it could have under Rudd/Gillard/Rudd?
I think we all know the answer to that question.
Cheers
Chris
Yep I acknowledge that, however the phrase " compared to X,Y,Z, Australia is doing...." is often used in media and politics and is essentially a meaningless throw away statement .manticle said:keep in mind the context was Labels' statement "We had a world-wide recession and are well aware of that but the last complex, messy administration made it much worse in Australia than it needed to be"
Only a meaningless, throwaway statement if it's not contextualised which in any decent article it will be. Same meaningless bunkum is applied to the notion of 'economic mismanagement' being applied only to Labour Governments and sensible handling of an economy being applied only to conservative governments.TasChris said:Yep I acknowledge that, however the phrase " compared to X,Y,Z, Australia is doing...." is often used in media and politics and is essentially a meaningless throw away statement .
If the Greens won the election? WTF?Forever Wort said:The reconstitution of departments and ministries has directly affected our business; this is not to say it would be any different if the Greens had won the election instead of the Coalition, it is just a fact of life when the majority of your clients are government.
Enter your email address to join: