I think I would wait the time for conditioning to take place, maybe it was the choice of yeast, not the method of fermentation.PS.........Wided eyed and legless (WEAL) I owe you a beer. Maybe you can tell me where I need to improve on.
How do you prime your beer before bottling?
I think I would wait the time for conditioning to take place, maybe it was the choice of yeast, not the method of fermentation.
I use mostly swing tops and dextrose too, but I always bulk prime. However, if you have your process for measuring your dextrose and putting into your bottles in your fingers, doesn't seem that anything can go wrong.I use 500ml swing tops and put a measured amount of dextrose worthy of a 750 ml bottle (Hefe's need a bit more carbs than normal beer). I'm not really worried because it was only 2 days conditioning in the bottle.....but after a week (which should be in two days time) if it is not carbed then ........well.....
I use mostly swing tops and dextrose too, but I always bulk prime. However, if you have your process for measuring your dextrose and putting into your bottles in your fingers, doesn't seem that anything can go wrong.
W.r.t. swing top bottles, however, I noticed a difference in the force needed to close them, and giving the spring a bit of adjustment to make them close better. I have a whole lot of bottles from a German brewery (Bolten), which seem to close less well, the rubber on them is not as thick. The beer was still good, but flat and darker. So loss of carbonation is possible with them, especially if you can open and close them without much force.
Late to this thread, but I can’t see anywhere which strain of yeast you are using?
I would expect that yeast strain, pitching rate and temperature schedule would have a much larger impact on ester production than the difference in pressure between “closed” (with airlock) and open.
In my experience I get a good banana/clove balance using WY3068 pitched at the lower end (but not under pitched - say ~500K cells/ml/degree plato) starting cool (~13C) and allowed to rise to a controlled temp of ~17C (my understanding is that this is based on a classical German Hefeweizen fermentation schedule) . Other strains may behave differently with respect to pitching rate and temperature. I also find that it it best not to oxygenate the wort if I am aiming for a classic German Hefeweizen with this strain.
I realise that you we unable to control temperature for this one, but temperature is probably the variable with biggest influence so it needs to be controlled if you want useful results from your experiments.
Thanks for this. I used an American Hefeweizen yeast and after two and a bit weeks of bottle conditioning I am finding this version of Hefe to be the least interesting out of my three attempts thus far. Temperature control was non-existent with this brew and it did hover around the 18 degs mark for most of the fermentation..
So, specifically which strain are you using - wyeast 1010?
Yeah, ok. I suspect your problem is yeast selection. If you just picked a true German hefeweizen strain, (say Wyeast 3068) you'd have all the banana you could wish for.I used White labs American Hefeweizen Ale Yeast - WLP 320
Yeah, ok. I suspect your problem is yeast selection. If you just picked a true German hefeweizen strain, (say Wyeast 3068) you'd have all the banana you could wish for.
Currently you're trying to coax banana esters out of a yeast that doesn't really want to do that.
From the white labs site:
"This strain ferments much cleaner than it’s hefeweizen strain counterparts. It produces very slight banana and clove notes and has low flocculation, leaving resulting beers with characteristic cloudiness."
Have you tried any of the others? I think the 320 (and Wyeast 1010) are specifically selected for American wheat beers which tend not to have the same banana/clove character as a German Hefeweizen, hence those strains are a lot cleaner, although still low flocculators.
Thanks for this. I used an American Hefeweizen yeast and after two and a bit weeks of bottle conditioning I am finding this version of Hefe to be the least interesting out of my three attempts thus far. Temperature control was non-existent with this brew and it did hover around the 18 degs mark for most of the fermentation.
I think I will have another go in colder weather and use your suggested yeast.
Open fermentation was worth a try however I think I need to cover off all parts of the process, like temp control, to have a successful brew.
Well, many commercial swing tops are glued or melted together with the sealing rings, so the complete cork mechanism must be replaced.You could buy new rubber rings and replace the thin rings, that would make the bottles close better.
Yeah, ok. I suspect your problem is yeast selection. If you just picked a true German hefeweizen strain, (say Wyeast 3068) you'd have all the banana you could wish for.
Currently you're trying to coax banana esters out of a yeast that doesn't really want to do that.
From the white labs site:
"This strain ferments much cleaner than it’s hefeweizen strain counterparts. It produces very slight banana and clove notes and has low flocculation, leaving resulting beers with characteristic cloudiness."
Have you tried any of the others? I think the 320 (and Wyeast 1010) are specifically selected for American wheat beers which tend not to have the same banana/clove character as a German Hefeweizen, hence those strains are a lot cleaner, although still low flocculators.
Enter your email address to join: