crowmanz
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13/1/11
- Messages
- 613
- Reaction score
- 222
There you go mate.GalBrew said:If that is the case then a name change is definitely in order.
https://craftypint.com/news/1523/Independence_Day
There you go mate.GalBrew said:If that is the case then a name change is definitely in order.
Yes, it's a good move. Good on them. I do find it a bit disingenuous to use the fees from the big boys to found the CBIA and then give them the boot , but at least they are finally coming clean (not sure why they didn't start out this way).crowmanz said:
The difference is a small guy is just trying to survive and grow.GalBrew said:I think it's a bit naive to think that the small breweries aren't also in it for the cash (pretty bad business planning otherwise). The big boys just have the jump on them by 150 years or so!
I agree with you and are on the side of independent breweries. It's just the hypocrisy that was inherent in the founding of the CBIA that gives me the *****.Roosterboy said:The difference is a small guy is just trying to survive and grow.
The big multinationals in any industry try to reduce competition to protect their market share , that is a fact.
Here in Australia, the small brewery will nearly always be owned by Australians, that's the BIG difference in my opinion.
Great article although it does ramble on a bit.Mardoo said:I've been reading so many of the "both sides of the buyout story" articles, and I have to say that this one rings most true with me.
https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/05/the-straw-man-arguments-of-craft-beer-sell-outs.html
I have to say it's inspired me to be more careful about the overseas beers I buy, and to focus a whole lot more on Aus/NZ.
Enter your email address to join: