evoo4u
Well-Known Member
After a few years of no-chilling, I've been pondering why my dark beers turn out better than pale ones.I think I have the answer - the dark ones are usually malt-driven, where as the pales I have been trying to brew are lacking the desired hop flavours and aromas. Without employing the Argon method and/or dry hopping, yesterday I used my new immersion chiller for the first time.
At FO, I re-circulated tank water through the 15 metres of 12mm copper tube, and achieved a rapid temperature reduction down to around 40C, but further reduction was very slow, even with regular agitation of the wort in the kettle. Which brings me to the topic of kettle design.
I use a 50 litre s/s keg, which is a substantial mass of metal, particularly around the base. This heated base ring, and the heat-soaked burner itself, keep adding heat into the wort despite running huge quantities of water through the chiller at around temp 24C. The full kettle is too heavy to lift off the burner and into a bath or similar, so I finally settled for a wort temperature of 30C before draining it into the FV. [ EDIT - I know I could employ a pre-chiller in an ice bath.That's maybe down the track]
Before draining it, I removed the immersion chiller and used the mash paddle to get a whirlpool going. Hot whirlpooling (with Brewbrite) has always worked well for me, but yesterday's low-temp effort was a failure. I've read about the benefits of high temp whirlpooling (aka poor whirlpooling at lower temperatures), but I'm wondering whether the small diameter and concave base of the kettle (keg) are contributing factors to the non-existent trub cone.
In summary: Would I have more success in chilling and subsequent trub-coning with a larger diameter, flat-bottomed kettle with less thermal mass?
Ideas?
At FO, I re-circulated tank water through the 15 metres of 12mm copper tube, and achieved a rapid temperature reduction down to around 40C, but further reduction was very slow, even with regular agitation of the wort in the kettle. Which brings me to the topic of kettle design.
I use a 50 litre s/s keg, which is a substantial mass of metal, particularly around the base. This heated base ring, and the heat-soaked burner itself, keep adding heat into the wort despite running huge quantities of water through the chiller at around temp 24C. The full kettle is too heavy to lift off the burner and into a bath or similar, so I finally settled for a wort temperature of 30C before draining it into the FV. [ EDIT - I know I could employ a pre-chiller in an ice bath.That's maybe down the track]
Before draining it, I removed the immersion chiller and used the mash paddle to get a whirlpool going. Hot whirlpooling (with Brewbrite) has always worked well for me, but yesterday's low-temp effort was a failure. I've read about the benefits of high temp whirlpooling (aka poor whirlpooling at lower temperatures), but I'm wondering whether the small diameter and concave base of the kettle (keg) are contributing factors to the non-existent trub cone.
In summary: Would I have more success in chilling and subsequent trub-coning with a larger diameter, flat-bottomed kettle with less thermal mass?
Ideas?
Last edited: