idzy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31/10/13
- Messages
- 862
- Reaction score
- 409
What Howard did was take what was a legally available firearm and make it illegal. Then proceeded to take them out of peoples hands. Martin Bryant didn't obtain the firearm illegally and wouldn't be able to commit the same offense now. It is easy to say, oh you can go and get illegal firearms. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't know where to get one personally and imagine many are the same, therefore when someone flies off the handle, they only have access to a bolt action, or other, but not a semi-auto.Brooa said:First of all let me say that I'm an ex-serviceman trained in the correct & safe use/storage of fire arms. I don't currently own a firearm. Do I believe we should be allowed to own (not carry) firearms.......Yes I do. I also believe there should be strict rules & regulations around such allowances. Do I think guns are the problem?..........Hell no!!!!! I'm sure that if I was that type of person, I could run down Queen St. Mall in Brisbane holding a screwdriver, & kill a heap of people before someone took me down. The bottom line is "Guns don't kill people......People do". Gun ownership just has to be manage properly. The way Howard did it after Port Arthur, while well intentioned, took the guns off the wrong people. i.e: The law abiding people. The criminals/underworld still get their hands on high powered automatic, or concealable firearms. I wish I knew the answer but I don't. I do know that taking guns off everyone, only takes them off those who would never have used them illegally anyway.
Just my two bobs worth.
