manticle
Standing up for the Aussie Bottler
So the answer to women being potentially forced to do something is to force women to do something?
The motive behind is clear, indicated by both the others who support it and Lambie's previous discussions about extreme Islam, halal and Islamic dress. One more time in case you missed the other 7 million - the ban is only enforced if/when a certain terror level is reached so what happens to the noble motivations when the level drops lower?
A discussion around cultural practices that do impinge on legal freedoms and solutions to them would be most welcome. This bill is not it.
You have avoided (multiple times) two points previously made.
1. Some Muslim women, educated and free thinking, willingly wear islamic headress of various types.
2. Simply banning the burqua in public will give those women who are forced by husbands/fathers/uncles/brothers (and I am absolutely not suggesting that isn't the case many, many times) less choice because if successful, they then won't be allowed to leave the house.
As for KKK - there's a number of reasons why they're not a terrorist organisation officially, including the fact there are multiple klans through history with some common aims but no common organisation. Many of these, including the original/primary have conducted themselves in a way designed to instil terror in civilians through violent acts (with identity disguised).
I don't believe the US ever designate domestic groups as Terrorist either - only foreign. Happy to be wrong on that last.
And for the record, I doubt there is anyone here who agrees with fundamentalist perspectives on the role or treatment if women - not you, not I, not DBs and not GFWAU.
The motive behind is clear, indicated by both the others who support it and Lambie's previous discussions about extreme Islam, halal and Islamic dress. One more time in case you missed the other 7 million - the ban is only enforced if/when a certain terror level is reached so what happens to the noble motivations when the level drops lower?
A discussion around cultural practices that do impinge on legal freedoms and solutions to them would be most welcome. This bill is not it.
You have avoided (multiple times) two points previously made.
1. Some Muslim women, educated and free thinking, willingly wear islamic headress of various types.
2. Simply banning the burqua in public will give those women who are forced by husbands/fathers/uncles/brothers (and I am absolutely not suggesting that isn't the case many, many times) less choice because if successful, they then won't be allowed to leave the house.
As for KKK - there's a number of reasons why they're not a terrorist organisation officially, including the fact there are multiple klans through history with some common aims but no common organisation. Many of these, including the original/primary have conducted themselves in a way designed to instil terror in civilians through violent acts (with identity disguised).
I don't believe the US ever designate domestic groups as Terrorist either - only foreign. Happy to be wrong on that last.
And for the record, I doubt there is anyone here who agrees with fundamentalist perspectives on the role or treatment if women - not you, not I, not DBs and not GFWAU.