Rocker1986
Well-Known Member
That's basically the method I've been using since around this time last year. It works well for me so I'm happy to continue using it.
Do you 2 guys above experience any extra diacetyl because of the quick lager method? The reason I ask is because I tryed it on my last lager (Munich Helles) and it took 7 days post FG to clean up the diacetyl. Im not sure if it was the quick lager or the Wyeast 2352 Munich Lager II yeast I used as I hadnt used that strain before. The strain info suggests it is a low diacetyl producer.Rocker1986 said:That's basically the method I've been using since around this time last year. It works well for me so I'm happy to continue using it.
Mine also finished at 18 I think and I left it there or possibly raised it even higher (id have to jump on the computer to check my records but currently im very happy drinking kölsch on the couch) to try get rid of that diacetyl. It eventually went after the week.Rocker1986 said:I'm either gonna guess that there's not much there or I can't detect it personally because I've never had any problems with diacetyl in lagers fermented with that schedule. I've only used Wyeast 2001 Urquell yeast on them. Mine usually get about 5 days post FG at the higher temp, perhaps being at 18 it cleans up quicker? :unsure:
On a homebrew level, google 'diacetyl force test'. On a commercial level, fancy scientific equipment.kaiserben said:How do you do the test for diacetyl?
Enter your email address to join: