@kixbooty
No personal offense intended, but as bum mentioned fundamentals, I find a fundamental principle based on print as a root or primary form of publication a problematic basis to work from. Anecdotally, a lot of people say they prefer print but are less willing to pay.for it.
In my world, book publishing, it is probably more discussed and has more print hardened luddites fearful of changing models effecting approaches to publishing, and frankly, is less likely to adapt to new media than other publishing sectors. Even some of the largest publishers like random house, penguin, etc. Are having trouble changing cultures in many respects. I shouldn't.have assumed or inferred your lack of knowledge or awareness of contemporary concerns in this area, but it does concern me how universities.deliver content in this field. I.have concerns about how designers are trained for example.
I have published articles in this area, discussing problems with approaches to what we now call "publishing". And, I have colleagues and know printers who have personally struggled through the.small boutique independent periodical side of things and its cutthroat. Takes a lot of innovation and passion to survive. And by that I mean a lot of hours, often low to no pay. It's a bitch of a beast.
I appreciate the content side and I think you're building a great audience profile, and have some great suggestions here. Guess.I forget this is a home brewing forum and not a publishing forum.
Ive argued myself, for a strong and commited basis for pprint to.continue, but practically see it as an uphill battle. One worth fighting for, but the survivors I've seen diversify, and quickly, if not first. Talk to people working at the. ABC about the 360 degree coverage and tthey will tell you about lack of editorial vigour due to lack of resources, stretched staff & burnout rates.
I hope you get it up and running, I'd love. To read the mag, but I'm playing devils advocate.
It's a fucked up beast the old publishing game.
My 2 bucks 50.