tcraig20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17/9/07
- Messages
- 623
- Reaction score
- 0
Now that just smacks of anti-intellectualism, which is fine just not very clever.
Not really. Im one of those academics myself.
Perhaps I make my own point?
Now that just smacks of anti-intellectualism, which is fine just not very clever.
This is hillarious. More attempts by the media, academia and the government trying to control human behavior.
Suggesting that trying some alcohol will lead to alcohol abuse/alcoholism is like suggesting that kids who masturbate sets them on the road to being a rapist or something equally as rediculous.
Hehe.. Like how milk kills people: 100% of people who drank milk as a child, will die.
More attempts by the media, academia and the government trying to control human behavior.
Telling people they can't do something only incites them more, the govt needs to change policy in order to allow people who think they are mature enough to prove it, give them confidence to be safe with booze..
And as a tax specialist with a little bit of experience in this area the main change I would be recommending is taxation. Wine Equalisation tax has to go, it taxes on the value of the product not the amount of alcohol. So the result you pay less tax per glass if you drink cask wine than if you drink bottled. Hardly encouraging responsible drinking, if anything encouraging binge drinking and alcohol abuse...
Secondly, support for craft breweries and a system that penalises mass produced beers aimed at mass consumption. The culture around drinking needs to change by force - encourage savouring finer products rather than guzzling products produced for the sole reason of guzzling (because thats what the market wants...so a bit circular).
Hehe.. Like how milk kills people: 100% of people who drank milk as a child, will die.
A lit of people miss the correlation =/= causation thing.... :lol:
I agree. Excise should be levied on alcoholic content universally, not the bizzare system that currently exists.
Doesnt this just reintroduce the complexity that we just got rid of with the WET? I really dont think that the quality of the product has much to do with a guzzling culture. If nothing else was available, people would guzzle craft beer, with little consideration of the subtle and sublime qualities of the product. I dont think that any law, regulation, or tax regime is going to turn the average punter into a real ale twat.
Ah yeah. And what do you do for a living?
You may want to consider the news cycle and how it relates to the scientific community.
(Seems unfortunately closer to the truth than I'd like)
Bingo.
None of my research has ever made it to the media without first going via the media liaison officer, then a journalist until it looks nothing like the boring, scientific papers i publish.
A few years back i was researching anti-cancer drugs and the preliminary results showed that the drug i had developed had a 100% kill rate in a test tube.
Released to the media it would have read something like - Monash researcher has found the cure for cancer.
Not all us scientists/academics are up ourselves Bribie! Some of us are normal drunks like the rest of ya :lol:
Just to clarify one of my daughters will not and has never touched alcohol - she is almost 18 and it is something she is not interested in in the slightest.
My 13 year was sitting at the kitchen bench a few months back and casually asked "Dad, what does vodka taste like?" So I went over to the fine port and spirit cabinet and got the vodka out and poured a small amount into a wine glass and gave it to her. She was surprised, shocked and aghast - I just said have a sniff, you dont have to taste it if you dont want to but since you asked have a sniff and see what flavours you find. She did so and was not impressed at all, I think she may have dipped her finger in and then licked the very small amount of vodka off of it and was certainly unimpressed. Ultimately she got an answer to her question and discovered vodka tastes like nail polish remover and certainly will remember it as something unpleasant. She is not the sort of kid that if I had of answered her query by saying wait until you are old enough to then sneak some when I wasnt around or go mad on the stuff because I had told her it was bad etc etc you get my point. She will on occassion have a sip of my beer or my wine but if she does I will always ask her what it tastes like, can she detect bitternes, maltiness, berries in the wine, oak in the chardonnay etc in short I am trying to teach her to appreciate the flavours and subtleties in what ever it is she tries. I do the same when I cook with her and all my daughters.
To suggest banning alcohol for anyone under 18 is ridiculous - firstly how are you going to police it secondly and most importantly it takes responsibility away from good and proper parenting and lastly it will create a bigger problem than the misguided idea is trying to prevent.
At Xmas time I have given my kids a little glass of champagne and we toast Xmas cheers, they have never once finished it! Am I teaching them to binge drink, drink responsibly or just taking the myth away?
Just to clarify one of my daughters will not and has never touched alcohol - she is almost 18 and it is something she is not interested in in the slightest.
If she has friends and is not supervised 24/7, I wouldn't be so sure she's NEVER touched alcohol.
She has friends and goes to parties where her friends drink and oftentimes get drunk - she has never touched a drop and doesnt really understand why her friends get drunk as they become rather boring and obnoxious not to mention loud and out of control. She doesnt need to be supervised, she has a brain and she makes her own choices she has never been one to follow the crowd - same goes for my oldest who has gone to a party on occassion and come home tipsy after two alco pops whilst those around her drink themselves stupid and end up vomiting in the gutter - she doesnt understand that either.
I have no doubt that if she had an alcoholic drink or even a taste she would tell us - we are that kind of family 100%
She has friends and goes to parties where her friends drink and oftentimes get drunk - she has never touched a drop and doesn't really understand why her friends get drunk as they become rather boring and obnoxious not to mention loud and out of control. She doesn't need to be supervised, she has a brain and she makes her own choices she has never been one to follow the crowd - same goes for my oldest who has gone to a party on occasion and come home tipsy after two alco pops whilst those around her drink themselves stupid and end up vomiting in the gutter - she doesnt understand that either.
I have no doubt that if she had an alcoholic drink or even a taste she would tell us - we are that kind of family 100%
Quite right, guzzlers will be guzzlers. But a WET style rebate in a different tax system doesn't create the same problems. WET is a problem because of the fact its is ad valorem (price) based, while excise is volumetric (quantity of alc). Providing a rebate along the same lines as the current microbrewery rebate (which is similar to the WET) encourages smaller producers. Smaller producers and more of them increases choice and with great choice there is an increased chance of more discerning drinkers... I don't have the cash to guzzle craft brews, but I certainly like to drink them.
She has friends and goes to parties where her friends drink and oftentimes get drunk - she has never touched a drop and doesnt really understand why her friends get drunk as they become rather boring and obnoxious not to mention loud and out of control.
It seems that I have misunderstood how the WET works. I had thought that it was more or less a direct excise rebate.
But I had thought that the WET was designed to encourage small wineries, much as you propose for craft brewing rebates. Am I wrong? If not, why hasnt it worked, and why should we expect it to work for beer?
Sorry for taking things so horrifically offtopic.
Enter your email address to join: