do you mean like cheap supermarket bakers yeast? or one of those fancy shmancy sourdough yeasts?
Um ... those fancy shmancy
sourdough starters are an interesting mix of flour, water, yeast, and
bacteria.
If the bacteria in a sourdough starter turns out not to be a problem for brewing (maybe it will hate wort, who knows) I would still be concerned about how long the ferment would take: commercial bakers' yeast can bulk ferment and prove a loaf in a couple of hours (give or take); a sourdough starter will take (in my experience) 10-12 hours. (Yeah, some starters are faster, some slower, and they work faster in warmer weather and slower when it's cooler. Sound familiar?
)
If someone tries this experiment, please do report what happens ... it'd be fascinating to know. With my only having one(*) home brew (kit at that!) completed and bottled (passable after one week in the bottles, but nothing to brag about) I think I need more experience before trying esoteric experiments.
BTW, the other way round -- using brewers yeast to bake with -- has a long history. Search with your favourite search engine for
barm, or for a modern discussion see
Dan Lepard's commentary on his Barm Bread recipe which uses yeast from bottle conditioned beer. (I'd link to the recipe, but I don't think Dan has published it online; it's from his book
The Handmade Loaf which I heartily recommend to anyone interested in bread baking of any type.)
[ Edit: forgot to mention but yes, as the previous reply says, sourdough yeasts are "wild", and probably from the flour(s) the sourdough starter is created and maintained with, plus of course your regular yeast mutational drift. You might discover the next great commercial ale yeast ... or a monster! ]
Cheers!
(*) OK, sometime in the early to mid 90's I brewed an extract brew at some commercial place that provided ingredients, equipment, and supervision/instruction. The resulting beer was tainted -- a metallic flavour is the best I can describe it -- and when the guy running the place couldn't taste it (or refused to admit to tasting it, perhaps) I didn't go back. Getting way off topic, I found a couple of those bottles in the back of the cupboard a year or two back, and tried 'em: yup, hadn't improved in the meantime. (Hadn't got any worse, either, so the beer lasted longer than ten years in the bottle!)