... just asking what the concerns are from experienced brewers about BIAB.
Is the concern that the temperature control is not as good, the grain/water ratio changes the extraction chemistry, or what are the things that make the more experienced brewers with the full kit say the traditional method is better?
Hi there Bjorn,
In reality, you will find few experienced brewers with the full kit say that traditional is better. The over-whelming majority of experienced brewers were very helpful and enthusiastic in the early days of testing out this method. There was a lot of help from them both on and off forum. Intelligent questions were asked and explored. Some that you and others mentioned are...
1. Temperature Control - This is actually easier than say batch-sparging in an esky as you have an easy heat source to apply.
2. Grain/Water Ratio - A read
here under Mash Thickness will tell you this seems to be a bit of a myth. And, as an example of experienced brewers helping out, AndrewQLD tried a full-volume mash in his esky before I even tried a BIAB one.
3. Longevity - I have 2 beers in my kegs now that are 12 months old and 18 months old. One lager and one ale. The lager has had a mild infection fault from the beginning but still managed a bronze medal a few months ago. (Didn't enter the 18 month one as the only reason for entering even one beer was to get free tickets to the exhibitor's tasting
) I also transported a lager from the Gold Coast to Perth over 10 weeks in horrific temperatures a few years back. Unbelievably, it was great :blink: though the ale I transported with it nearly killed me as the keg had become de-pressurised.
4. Low Alcohol and Light Coloured Brews - Once again, plenty of brews done here with no problems at all.
5. Efficiency - Several BIAB brewers have measured their efficiency figures and sent them to me. Average efficiency into the kettle is 82% which is very good.
I think the above were the only concerns and all have been explored.
Any negativity you have heard about BIAB comes from just a few people who I think enjoy an argument which makes a lot of noise/posts. This is annoying because you'll find, on the smallest examination, that their arguments never stood up but have been copied around enough to create a lot of misinformation. For example, Brad from BeerSmith wrote a very good article on BIAB but unfortunately some of the above myths were included in it. Things like this further strengthen the myths created by just a few people. (Brad is aware of this but it will take time for him to re-write the article.)
As for winning competitions, I think the real skill here lies in recipe formulation not the brewing rig. Some brewers develop this skill at a speed that blows me away. Randyrob and BribieG are two examples I can think of and LloydieP/Katie have it as well I suspect. Others take years to develop the skill.
If you don't have this innate knack for recipe formulation then I reckon the best thing you can do is try other brewer's beers and when you find one you love, grab the recipe. That's what I do
I still only have found 3 beers that I love to brew again and again. These recipes were not found from award-winning beers but from beers I drank from other brewers and one from a recipe provided on AHB.
The beers
you love are quite likely not to be competition winners so if you find one from another brewer, make sure you grab it. And, if you think it is great but it fails in a competition, it is nothing to worry about. It could well be that if the judges didn't have to taste your beer along with a heap of others, their palate may well have found it truly delicious.
So Bjorn, brew on with confidence!
Pat