Thanks for the replies guys, its good to know it will be useful, I was not sure how many people are already doing this stuff and how many are still learning about it all.
From what I understand the yeast 'adapt' to the particular wort they are in, they condition themselves to operate best in those conditions, hence, if you take the yeast when it is most active and pitch it into identical wort, they continue as they are and everything is good. However if you pitch the yeast into different wort (say you brew AG but made a starter from LDME for example) the yeast get 'shocked' by the new conditions and have to spend time and energy changing and adapting to the new situation, this is not good for them or your ferment (think of the extreme example of growing bugs in fresh-water and then throwing them directly into sea-water, you'd not expect them to adapt to easily).
On the other hand, by letting the yeast fully ferment out the starter and then settle, they can build up their sterol/glycogen reserves (almost like a dormancy phase), hence when you pitch them into the 'different' wort they wake up, use up those stored-reserves which help them to adapt to the 'new' conditions, and away they go. Yeast pitched when it is most active does not have those reserves built-up so they have a more difficult time adapting.
While I understand the logic behind leaving the starter ferment out - without shaking - after you see yeast activity, the 'Yeast' book and the Wyeast link above, both detail that the constant stirring or shaking is not just about oxygenation, its also about mixing the yeast into the starter and de-gassing CO2 all of which help grow more healthy yeast. So while not shaking the fermenting starter would reduce oxygen induced off-flavours, it may also result in less healthy and happy yeast than could have been made with more constant agitation. Pitching the entire starter is much easier and can be done more quickly, so in those situations using your approach would be a logical compromise.
That's been said a few times before, but I'm not sure the powers-that-be like the idea so we'll just continue like this.ahem... yeast sub-forum... ahem h34r:
That's a really good idea, I just keep my starter in the lounge room where it we usually have the aircond or heater on to keep it about low/mid 20s.made a quick climate control box for my yeast as its a bit cool in my lab area(has a laugh to himself)Used a 55lt esky temp control for heating and an old brew pad.Sat on a nice cosy
20 oC and both flasks are ready to go through the settling period before being used on Friday and Saturday.
manticle when I was suggesting that the starter and beer wort should be the same, I was not thinking so much about the flavours in the beer, but what happens to the yeast in that situation.One question though: If pitching the entire active starter in as I usually do, the first point about conditions not being needed to make good beer (temp aeration etc) is less so as far as I understand. I believe if you pitch 2 litres of oxidised estery beer into your wort, those flavours can transfer to the final product.
I treat my starters with vigorous shaking until krausen appears, then leave it alone at roughly ferment temps.
From what I understand the yeast 'adapt' to the particular wort they are in, they condition themselves to operate best in those conditions, hence, if you take the yeast when it is most active and pitch it into identical wort, they continue as they are and everything is good. However if you pitch the yeast into different wort (say you brew AG but made a starter from LDME for example) the yeast get 'shocked' by the new conditions and have to spend time and energy changing and adapting to the new situation, this is not good for them or your ferment (think of the extreme example of growing bugs in fresh-water and then throwing them directly into sea-water, you'd not expect them to adapt to easily).
On the other hand, by letting the yeast fully ferment out the starter and then settle, they can build up their sterol/glycogen reserves (almost like a dormancy phase), hence when you pitch them into the 'different' wort they wake up, use up those stored-reserves which help them to adapt to the 'new' conditions, and away they go. Yeast pitched when it is most active does not have those reserves built-up so they have a more difficult time adapting.
While I understand the logic behind leaving the starter ferment out - without shaking - after you see yeast activity, the 'Yeast' book and the Wyeast link above, both detail that the constant stirring or shaking is not just about oxygenation, its also about mixing the yeast into the starter and de-gassing CO2 all of which help grow more healthy yeast. So while not shaking the fermenting starter would reduce oxygen induced off-flavours, it may also result in less healthy and happy yeast than could have been made with more constant agitation. Pitching the entire starter is much easier and can be done more quickly, so in those situations using your approach would be a logical compromise.
I did not think it would have a significant effect, but that may have just me being lazy rather than testing it, maybe its something you should do.Have been toying with this idea for a while, but have been worried about the ph of the last runnings and its effects on the yeast; what are your thoughts?
Good point, I don't sit the foil tightly on the lids and always make sure the gas and wort can escape if it needs to - something which it does all too often and then I spend 1/2 hour cleaning up the stove top from burnt-sticky-starter-wort.Great thread, however the iamge of your flask on a stove with alfoil brings bad memories. Did the same thing the other week and ended up with 120 degree water all over the ceiling and floor. Nasty burn to! Needs a warning!