Hi David,
Do you know why is the comp being dumbed down?
Surely the way to 'better beer' is to raise, not lower the standard.
Rgds,
Peter
Hi Peter,
Sorry, no. I resigned from the AABA after last years competition so have not been involved in the discussions.
But I have
read:
"27 September 2007 Rule D1 changed to remove requirement for qualifying entries to AABC
to achieve a score of at least 60%, but only for AABC2007. This was based on a yes vote
from all states with a condition that it revisited soon after AABC2007 to clarify the situation
for future competitions. Some comments were:
• Our judges were very strict and stuck firmly to the guidelines. We had several beers
that were good, but out of style enough, or had a few classic faults that it caused a
point loss. When they fell below the 60%, I was really curious how they would have
stacked up against the other states.
• I think the judges really need some guidance. A mark below 60% means the judge is
saying that the beer has problems and/or is not quite to style.
• In principal I think the 60% rule is a good one.
• I think we need a follow-up discussion about reference beers [for standardising
scoring], which have proved very effective in recent ACT comps.
• A discussion soon after this year's national comp would be good to clarify the
situation for next year's state comps"
David