Liam_snorkel
كافر
- Joined
- 16/9/08
- Messages
- 5,800
- Reaction score
- 2,875
Sorry, I wasn't referring to your whole post (if you read through the thread, there are periodic interjections of what I was taking about). Carry on, I'll show myself the door.
So why are distance runners thin and couch potatoes fat?Liam_snorkel said:The human body is very good at maintaining the status quo. That's why some people can eat like a wrestler and look like a jockey, and vice versa. The trouble is that what people are trying to do is force their metabolism and hormonal system into doing the opposite that it's conditioned to.
That's why the diet industry is a thing. Obese people will calorie restrict, count every joule, and the second they overstep the mark their body will try to restore back to its previous state. That's why formulated diets and techniques exist.
Exercise is important for overall health and metabolism, but not that useful for (directly) controlling body fat. You get the idea.
pipsyboy said:So why are distance runners thin and couch potatoes fat?
Because distance runners run distances and couch potatoes don't.
And why does Michael Phelps, who eats 12,000 calories a day, not get fat?
Because Michael Phelps burns 11,000 calories a day.
Conditioning, exactly the point that was being made.
yum beer said:So why are distance runners thin and couch potatoes fat?
Because distance runners run distances and couch potatoes don't.
And they burn calories whilst running them distances.
And why does Michael Phelps, who eats 12,000 calories a day, not get fat?
Because Michael Phelps burns 11,000 calories a day.
My point exactly. He burns more than he eats so loses weight (or in his case doesn't put it on.
Conditioning, exactly the point that was being made.
I'm talking about losing weight too. My two previous examples are people who've just got the balance right and are maintaining weight. If they stopped exercising and ate the same calories they'd get fat. If they started exercising again they would lose weight.Liam_snorkel said:You're missing the point, they have conditioned their bodies to be that way. It takes a long time to change your physiology. We're on the same page here, not arguing really, except you're taking about maintaining weight, this thread is about losing weight.
If Michael Phelps ate 12,000 calories a day and burnt 11,000 he'd gain 50kg a year.yum beer said:So why are distance runners thin and couch potatoes fat?
Because distance runners run distances and couch potatoes don't.
And why does Michael Phelps, who eats 12,000 calories a day, not get fat?
Because Michael Phelps burns 11,000 calories a day.
Conditioning, exactly the point that was being made.
That's the way I've interpreted the message!Liam_snorkel said:Does that mean I should drink beer in the morning?
Shouldn't even need to ask.Does that mean I should drink beer in the morning?
Enter your email address to join: