Im not going to argue any points you have made, because obviously u have been stung and are sore on the subject.
I disagree with the internet restrictions myself, but fact is others abuse it, and thats why "nazis" are there to enforce it now..give people an inch and they usually take a mile.
Boo hoo that some cant wait 2 hrs for a break to look at the internet?...Its probably not about shaving a few cents off here and there, its probably more about getting people to do whats needed to make (sometimes unrealistic) deadlines or quotas...
so I believe that within reason, un-interefered internet access (if you sit in front of a pc for your job) should be able to be taken for granted....
I agree also, but like i said, people can and will abuse it.
If everyone in Australia didn't use their pc for anything other than work purposes, he might lose some business!
My example isnt bad, its the fact u are taking it in the context that people need to use the internet to help support an online business, otherwise they would go bust. My example was to show if an employee was not "on task" and spent their time (little bit here and there adds up) browsing, nothing would get done....
BIG Disclaimer *Sorry for using Ross as an example, i just thought it might make a beer relevant example. Im in no way saying Ross is bad at anything, or his business is slow etc etc etc....
Using logs are a far more restrictive way to enforce what people are looking at rather than blocking websites. People know they will have to respond to what, why, and how long they were "not on the job" to start with in the first place, if someone chose to review the logs...
And i dont have an demoralising look on life, i have a different opinion (Welcome to the internet) that work is to work, breaks are your time to do what u want, regardless of how many hours u work.