I am now an 'all - grain' brewer. Have been since July. I have averaged a brew a fortnight since then, all of them AG and am starting to feel like I am really controlling the process well and brewing some good beers. I'm now cracking my own grain, building my own recipes, I built my gear myself (despite my 'tool challenged' status ) and would like to think I fit this new very narrow definition of being a 'real brewer' that you blokes are presenting.
However I took quite a few years to get to this stage and certainly considered myself a 'real brewer' for most of the way. I would argue that extract 'n grain and part mash brewing should definitely be classed as 'real brewing'. I was building my own recipes from scratch, experimenting with grains and hops etc. and controlling the process. I was also brewing some good beers, even if they were 'tainted' with the evil extract.
Why do we feel the need to differentiate? Is it to make us who are now brewing AG somehow feel superior? I haven't seen too many kit 'n kilo brewers coming on here dumping on the rest of us for wasting so much time and effort, or carrying on about how their latest supermarket brew is far superior to anything brewed from scratch so why choose to reinforce some sort of 'brewer's divide'? It just smacks of prejudice to me.
Each to their own. I'm a 'real brewer', but I like a broad church. Room for all styles and levels. Please let's not get too elitist. I've learned HEAPS from blokes like Jayse over the last 18 months or so on this site and it is because of sites like this that I am now as into this craft as I am. Let's not scare off any other newbie 'real brewers' in training eh?
Shawn.
However I took quite a few years to get to this stage and certainly considered myself a 'real brewer' for most of the way. I would argue that extract 'n grain and part mash brewing should definitely be classed as 'real brewing'. I was building my own recipes from scratch, experimenting with grains and hops etc. and controlling the process. I was also brewing some good beers, even if they were 'tainted' with the evil extract.
Why do we feel the need to differentiate? Is it to make us who are now brewing AG somehow feel superior? I haven't seen too many kit 'n kilo brewers coming on here dumping on the rest of us for wasting so much time and effort, or carrying on about how their latest supermarket brew is far superior to anything brewed from scratch so why choose to reinforce some sort of 'brewer's divide'? It just smacks of prejudice to me.
Each to their own. I'm a 'real brewer', but I like a broad church. Room for all styles and levels. Please let's not get too elitist. I've learned HEAPS from blokes like Jayse over the last 18 months or so on this site and it is because of sites like this that I am now as into this craft as I am. Let's not scare off any other newbie 'real brewers' in training eh?
Shawn.