Thirsty Boy
ICB - tight shorts and poor attitude. **** yeah!
- Joined
- 21/5/06
- Messages
- 4,544
- Reaction score
- 106
Sorry Kai - I didn't mean for my thread (or that part of it) to sound like it was aimed at you - it wasn't - I could just sense things perhaps degrading into a slagging match rather than an exchange of ideas and made a probably poor attempt to head it off at the pass. Should have more clearly separated the junk waving bit of my post from the bit where I responded to your points. Apologies.Mate you're the one who called it a "nil all draw". I'm not measuring anything or claiming one method is better than the other, I'm disagreeing with a couple things you wrote.
Fair point, no argumentsYeah, cheap shop stock pots are cheap and good for decoctions if the dedicated kettle is unsuitable. You don't need a separate burner though, as you stated earlier.
For a two wort Partigyle - I see what you mean, you certainly could do it that way. I tend to think of Partigyle as the whole "Big Beer - Normal Beer - Table Beer" thing, so three worts; and thats what I had in mind. Doesn't really matter, as you pointed out, the whole thing can be done either way using a fermenter that we all have about the place anyway.Once the first wort is in the kettle, small beer wort can stay in the mash and be lautered out after the first boil is complete with no real detriment to quality.
Alternatively once the first wort is in the kettle, sparge liquor can be added as a batch sparge then second wort run straight back into the now-empty HLT where it can be boiled if the vessel is suitable.
No I didn't understand that - I missed it in the context somewhere. Most times (on AHB at least) when people say "double batch".. they mean double volume not consecutive brews. When we were discussing pot volumes etc and were talking about double batches earlier in the thread.. thats what we were talking about, I thought you were too.Do you understand I meant two separate batches, not a batch double in volume? So on a three vessel system it's second mash in the tun shortly after runoff is complete, in BIAB it's second brew in when first brew is completely finished. That's a big difference in time (unless you have two BIAB systems, eh Pat).
For consecutive brews - you are way right. The more vessels you have the easier it is to do end on end brews. For instance at work we have 7 (main) vessels. Hot Liquor, Cold Liquor, Mash Tun, Lauter Tun, Wort Receiver, Kettle, Whirlpool - And can have 3-4 brews in the system at once and get 10 brews per day out of a plant.... and we have two plants. Now thats how to do multiple brews in one day!! Especially in a system where the mash is conducted in the kettle (like BIAB); consecutive brews take comparatively forever.
Anyway - I had meant to leave this post alone - I think the OP has all the info he needs to make his choices by now. But when I realized that I had inadvertently insulted Kai, I thought I had better try to make amends for my lousy communication skills. Last thing I want to do is look like I am having a go at one of the people here on AHB who I really do think knows what they are talking about.
Sorry about that
Thirsty