No, not bragging. Just trying to make the point that if I was to offer some sort of guidance, it would not be purely speculative. It did come across as a bit wankerish, you're right.
I have all of the JS recipes on file; I wrote some of them. Not sure why I've kept them to be honest as they're not anything special. Not particularly interested these days in brewing high-gravity, high adjunct beers with cheap malts and 'process' yeasts. I wouldn't win trophies if I did.
Not sure if I would actually get myself in legal hot water by posting that sort of stuff, but needless to say, I wouldn't do so as I respect their intellectual property and it would be considered poor form in brewing circles and certainly disrespectful of Chuck and the boys at MSB.
I'm also of the opinion of 'recipe-shmecipe'. The awesome Pelican brewery in Pacific City, Oregon, details on its web site exactly how their beers are made. Their feeling is one of 'good luck, try to brew as well as we do'. That's their approach and I kind of like it. Others are a lot more sensitive and that's fine too.
I know from experience that if I brew my beers in another brewhouse, identical recipe, the beer will come out differently. My $0.02 worth would be this: Have a go, have a look at the result and evolve your beer from there. "Pretty good, needs a bit more roast character and some fattening up in the mid-palate". Perhaps. Make your changes, do it again, have another look. Keep doing that until you're happy. Like Ausdb said, the satisfaction comes from the development. The journey. Tony's recipe would be a very good starting point.