Eagleburger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6/2/14
- Messages
- 493
- Reaction score
- 119
Its nice to see that brand loyality promotion has evolved somewhat.
Catch and release for sport is simply cruel.DJ_L3ThAL said:Not picking but I love how some are opposing animal cruelty/mistreatment yet state they fish.
I don't consider a metal hook through the lip a regular part of any animals day, if the intent is just for amusement and not food. 2c
Binding a sheep’s legs and slitting its throat is the way we butchered all our sheep. It's also the only way of butchering I've seen any other farmer use. It isn't something enjoyable but families have to eat. It's not as instant as the bolt to the head or electric shock that abattoirs use, but you can only use what you have available.Dave70 said:Catch and release for sport is simply cruel.
Thats why stab everything I catch to death.
Just never play kabaddiDave70 said:Catch and release for sport is simply cruel.
Thats why stab everything I catch to death.
jimi said:Binding a sheep’s legs and slitting its throat is the way we butchered all our sheep. It's also the only way of butchering I've seen any other farmer use. It isn't something enjoyable but families have to eat. It's not as instant as the bolt to the head or electric shock that abattoirs use, but you can only use what you have available.
Judging people for their religious beliefs to carry out a practise popular amongst those without religious beliefs would seem stupid and hypocritical wouldn't it. Especially since the purpose of the Feast of Sacrifice (better translation) is essentially alms giving and about donating to the needy. The last side of beef I bought was $800 for about 100kg, ergo a full beast is about $1600 here in Australia. Donating two thirds of an animal to others and the needy, as they do is no small offering. I wonder what things would be like if our Christmas meals include a similar gesture?
The skinning of dogs alive in China would seem more abhorrent to me, but there's no religion in practise there, so that's not the target we want is it?
Not the best link I think.Dave70 said:Granted slitting a sheep's throat or contorting it to face Mecca prior to the act makes little difference, but I'm sure jimi, you don't slaughter your animals in such an amateurish and traumatic style as the keystone cop butchers in the video. Neither did your livestock just endure 11,000 km on a stinking, sweltering, overcrowded ship. As for feeding the poor,(ironically, most likely impoverished due to the fact their county is constantly embroiled in religious war) what about the other 364 days of the year? Eid al-Adha is a token gesture at best.
Bottom line is the whole exercise is unnecessary in the first place. And illegal. Its all here.
http://www.rspca.org.au/campaigns/live-export/live-export-facts
Ok.pcmfisher said:
True, Except for the tolerance bit.Eagleburger said:Some of the most generous, tolerant and generally exceptional **** sapiens a re deeply and proudly religious.
And some atheists and agnostics are arseholes.Eagleburger said:Some of the most generous, tolerant and generally exceptional **** sapiens a re deeply and proudly religious.
I have experienced the enlightenment of pixie dust. Dont think it stopped me being a ****.manticle said:You want to to believe in pixie dust mate you go for it but don't pretend it's necessary for the prevention of cuntiness.
Blind Dog said:No.
Firstly it's not Darwinism but evolution. Calling it Darwinism is a trick the religious right in the US use to suggest it is a belief founded on the ramblings of a mad Victorian with a massive beard
Anyway, evolution and whatever creation myth you pick are emphatically not two sides of the same argument. One is fatuous nonsense, the other a fastidiously researched, tested and refined scientific theory. And before anyone jumps on the 'it's just a theory bandwagon', so is gravity. A responsible parent would no more teach their child about creation than they would about fairies, leprechauns and unicorns
Is 'ideologies' the word youre looking for here? How do you have a society or for that matter a political system without ideologies?StalkingWilbur said:Ideologies are dangerous at best. They discourage thinking and promote hate.
If you need a book to tell you right from wrong and the threat of hell to keep you behaving, you're probably a **** anyway.
It's an odd word. AFAIK it arose in the French Revolution and simply meant the study of ideas as a science in itself, but fairly soon became a pejorative term. Modern usage seems to encompass the pejorative sense, as seemingly used here, a wider usage to encompass a system of institutions, government and society in general, and a strongly held idea or belief. Thus a Jihadist, a democrat and a humanist pacifist all adhere to an ideology, but its likely the word would be used differently to describe each, and perhaps not at all for the last 2 in our society.jimi said:Is 'ideologies' the word youre looking for here? How do you have a society or for that matter a political system without ideologies?