WE had that done at my old work 15yrs ago. Basically they all leak....There is 1Kw of microwave energy bouncing around in that small space. Do the maths.Lemon said:Hey stu have you had the annual check for microwaves to test do leaking radiation? Had the union rep tell me that he had bought himself the device to test for stray microwaves , they all leak.
I just bought a new one every year, no one else had equipment to test, but the national safety council decided that all microwaves required an annual test .
Morons
This is my one biggest gripe with the concept. The whole WHS concept has moved to having paperwork in place to prove that the employer has done something to address worker safety, so that should something occur A. they can provide evidence that they worker hasn't followed instructions or B. modify the document to address a new hazard or risk. This becomes the solution. "Hurt himself how? Was the possibility of the slip flange sliding as the pipe was lifted from the other end listed as a specific step? No? Well it needs to be put in and we need to be better at doing our JSEAs". This was an actual response in a meeting by a manager I worked with. This JSEA was already 14 pages long for a job that lasted 18h.jlm said:I love a good OH&S rant........I've seen a lot of people hurt during my time in the trade.....I'd wager 95% of those would have still happened even if a JSA/SWIMs/INSERTTHELATESTACRONYMHERE was correctly filled out.
Hope you're not a rabbisponge said:I've seen some pretty nasty injuries from Stanley knives slipping during use..
Shalom aleikhem!Blind Dog said:Hope you're not a rabbi
I will admit, those injuries are almost ways from incorrect use. Removing the risk just another way the employer can cover their ass..manticle said:Yes there can be nasty injuries but almost always from user error. Why is responsibility totally removed from the user?
There was a suggestion at my workplace that stanleys might go because someone cut themselves but the suggested replacements would in no way accomplish the necessary outcome. Might as well replace the forklift with a wheelbarrow.
mje1980 said:I do think that I'm much less likely to get seriously injured at work these days. That's a good thing for sure. The smaller things, though, can seem just crazy. Like, common sense.
There are a few jobs we do at work that take longer to isolate the energy sources than to do the work. It is silly sometimes, but at the end of the day, I don't make the rules I just follow them.
If the company is happy to lose time to safety precautions so be it.
What's just as annoying is people spending 45 mins arguing about doing a job when the job takes 15 minutes, or the classic, using a very flimsy safety reason not to do a job. Just do it fa fucks sake
Yeah obviously. I'm happy to take longer to make a job safe. Some people go nuts over it, and whinge about how much time it'll take etc.Coalminer said:Compared to the paperwork and grief of a death onsite then I know what most companies prefer
Enter your email address to join: