Hi all,
I'm reasonably new to Home Brewing and I am getting myself set up with all of the required equipment with a theory of "do it once and do it right".
I have a friend helping me out with the brewing equipment so that is already under way, but what I'm looking at doing is building a kegging system that offers a 'best of both worlds' approach between kegging and bottling. I have been reading through the forum and have learnt a lot in a short amount of time, but from what I can gather, nobody has been as adventurous (read crazy) to attempt something like this.
My priorities are (in order):
-Taste Quality/Experience
-Convenience
-Cost
I know the kegging vs bottling choice is a personal decision, but here is where I'm heading:
My beer will be tap served (nothing better than pouring your own brew from your tap in your own house!) from a little DIY machine as follows.
Utilise a Tap-A-Draft 6 litre bottle and modify the cap so that it can take a large bladder inside the bottle. There are a range of bladders that will do the job, especially considering the gas permeation requirements (you will see later why).
This way I can decide as I'm experimenting with different beer types if I want to force carb keg style or use sugar, bottle style.
The bladder will be interchangeable and arrive out of a packet sanitised so there would be no cleaning required here and only filling of one bottle for every 6 litres so that hassle is reduced. This also helps with finding refrigeration and storage space. I will also bleed any air out of the top of the bladder so that it does not get affected by the O2.
When the beer is ready, the custom cap will then click into a fitting that will force pressurised air (standard air) into the gap between the bottle and the bladder, giving me pressure. This is why it is important to have no gas permeation through the bladder as I don't want to lose CO2 or gain O2 in my brew. From what I can gather, this should be achievable in order to get a 6 month plus shelf life and 3 months plus once 'tapped'. And no need for any CO2 at all, assuming I decide to carb with sugar.
This pressure will force the brew through a heat exchanger running on glycol when the tap is opened and here is where it gets interesting. As it is for home use, I plan to keep a minimal amount of glycol (about 2L) and run that through a mini custom built refrigeration condenser for cooling so that I can turn the machine on and have my glycol down to temp in about 2 minutes. From my rough calcs, I estimate that I can cool the brew by up to 25 degrees (about 7kW of cooling) during the pour at a rate of about 4lpm (including a flooded font) which should be more than enough as it doesn't really get above 25 degrees in my house even in summer.
This way, getting home and deciding to have one is only a couple of minutes away, without needing to have refrigeration permanently on.
Keeping in mind that the taste is my main priority closely followed by brewing convenience, I'm sure there are a thousand things that I have not considered in preparation of this plan. And no, the convenience of not taking on such a complex project is not a consideration, I love a challenge.
Comments?
I'm reasonably new to Home Brewing and I am getting myself set up with all of the required equipment with a theory of "do it once and do it right".
I have a friend helping me out with the brewing equipment so that is already under way, but what I'm looking at doing is building a kegging system that offers a 'best of both worlds' approach between kegging and bottling. I have been reading through the forum and have learnt a lot in a short amount of time, but from what I can gather, nobody has been as adventurous (read crazy) to attempt something like this.
My priorities are (in order):
-Taste Quality/Experience
-Convenience
-Cost
I know the kegging vs bottling choice is a personal decision, but here is where I'm heading:
My beer will be tap served (nothing better than pouring your own brew from your tap in your own house!) from a little DIY machine as follows.
Utilise a Tap-A-Draft 6 litre bottle and modify the cap so that it can take a large bladder inside the bottle. There are a range of bladders that will do the job, especially considering the gas permeation requirements (you will see later why).
This way I can decide as I'm experimenting with different beer types if I want to force carb keg style or use sugar, bottle style.
The bladder will be interchangeable and arrive out of a packet sanitised so there would be no cleaning required here and only filling of one bottle for every 6 litres so that hassle is reduced. This also helps with finding refrigeration and storage space. I will also bleed any air out of the top of the bladder so that it does not get affected by the O2.
When the beer is ready, the custom cap will then click into a fitting that will force pressurised air (standard air) into the gap between the bottle and the bladder, giving me pressure. This is why it is important to have no gas permeation through the bladder as I don't want to lose CO2 or gain O2 in my brew. From what I can gather, this should be achievable in order to get a 6 month plus shelf life and 3 months plus once 'tapped'. And no need for any CO2 at all, assuming I decide to carb with sugar.
This pressure will force the brew through a heat exchanger running on glycol when the tap is opened and here is where it gets interesting. As it is for home use, I plan to keep a minimal amount of glycol (about 2L) and run that through a mini custom built refrigeration condenser for cooling so that I can turn the machine on and have my glycol down to temp in about 2 minutes. From my rough calcs, I estimate that I can cool the brew by up to 25 degrees (about 7kW of cooling) during the pour at a rate of about 4lpm (including a flooded font) which should be more than enough as it doesn't really get above 25 degrees in my house even in summer.
This way, getting home and deciding to have one is only a couple of minutes away, without needing to have refrigeration permanently on.
Keeping in mind that the taste is my main priority closely followed by brewing convenience, I'm sure there are a thousand things that I have not considered in preparation of this plan. And no, the convenience of not taking on such a complex project is not a consideration, I love a challenge.
Comments?