Thirsty Boy
ICB - tight shorts and poor attitude. **** yeah!
- Joined
- 21/5/06
- Messages
- 4,544
- Reaction score
- 106
I reckon you would most likely be getting more than 9% per hour or 3L per hour from a big pot like a 100L job.
But ... you say that you are getting the right numbers apart from volume?? if you were losing way too much to evaporation, then your OG would be higher than you expect it to be.
So, maybe its just a matter of how you/I are interpreting terms and how they are applied in in Beersmith etc.
Tell me EVERYTHING about your brew.
Exactly how much water you put in the pot at the start - exact grain weight - volume of kettle before the boil starts (after you have taken the bag out) - volume of the kettle at the end of your boil - the amount of trub etc you are leaving behind in the kettle - any extra anything you add to or take from the pot. Oh & whether you take the measurements hot or cold, it makes a 4%(ish) difference
If you dont have a way of measuring all these things, then you should. Knowing the state of your brew at every point means you can isolate where things are going wrong (if they do).
That way I can translate whats going on and help out if I can. If we are referring to one volume but mean two different things .... then its hard to make sense of each other.
For instance - if I was getting 40L into a fermentor of a wort of "normal" gravity say 1.05 then I'd probably have had a post boil volume of 42.5L, and in a 90min boil have boiled off 8L of water for a pre-boil of 50.5 and would have lost about 4.5L of water to my 9kg grain by absorption - meaning I would have started with 55L of water in the pot. With a bit of variance in the boil off or absorption rates - that could be the 52-54L "recipe" you were talking about. Which would make things almost perfectly normal.
Not saying that thats whats happening, just that the vagaries of communicating like this mean that it possible. Give us ALL the data and we can work it out for sure.
Cheers
Thirsty
But ... you say that you are getting the right numbers apart from volume?? if you were losing way too much to evaporation, then your OG would be higher than you expect it to be.
So, maybe its just a matter of how you/I are interpreting terms and how they are applied in in Beersmith etc.
Tell me EVERYTHING about your brew.
Exactly how much water you put in the pot at the start - exact grain weight - volume of kettle before the boil starts (after you have taken the bag out) - volume of the kettle at the end of your boil - the amount of trub etc you are leaving behind in the kettle - any extra anything you add to or take from the pot. Oh & whether you take the measurements hot or cold, it makes a 4%(ish) difference
If you dont have a way of measuring all these things, then you should. Knowing the state of your brew at every point means you can isolate where things are going wrong (if they do).
That way I can translate whats going on and help out if I can. If we are referring to one volume but mean two different things .... then its hard to make sense of each other.
For instance - if I was getting 40L into a fermentor of a wort of "normal" gravity say 1.05 then I'd probably have had a post boil volume of 42.5L, and in a 90min boil have boiled off 8L of water for a pre-boil of 50.5 and would have lost about 4.5L of water to my 9kg grain by absorption - meaning I would have started with 55L of water in the pot. With a bit of variance in the boil off or absorption rates - that could be the 52-54L "recipe" you were talking about. Which would make things almost perfectly normal.
Not saying that thats whats happening, just that the vagaries of communicating like this mean that it possible. Give us ALL the data and we can work it out for sure.
Cheers
Thirsty