rich_lamb
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28/9/07
- Messages
- 363
- Reaction score
- 4
I used to immersion-chill; but got rapidly sick of the extra hassle, time, water, etc so I moved to no-chill about half a dozen brews ago.
My beer quality took a hit as a result: less clarity, bitterness and hop flavour all over the place, astringency. I must be careful not to automatically ascribe all this to no-chill as I have changed a few other items and rarely brew the same recipe back to back.
I've worked on fixing most of these problems by doing the following:
1) Filtering out the trub and hops before the cube, which corrects most of the over-hopping
2) "Quasi-chilling". After the cube has had about 10 min on each side to pasteurise, I sit it in a tub of cool water to chill it more rapidly. I saw a graph of isomerisation vs temperature somewhere recently that suggested an inverse-log effect, such that isomerisation is almost negligable under about 80 degrees...
So I'll keep brewing and gathering results, though the impression I have is that chilling gives more control over the flavour and quality. When I get my big water tank and pump I will probably go back to chilling. Though my laziness may have increased by then.
For me, no-chill has more benefits than drawbacks at the moment. I can get a brew done after work, and I don't need my yeast ready to brew. Gotta love that.
My beer quality took a hit as a result: less clarity, bitterness and hop flavour all over the place, astringency. I must be careful not to automatically ascribe all this to no-chill as I have changed a few other items and rarely brew the same recipe back to back.
I've worked on fixing most of these problems by doing the following:
1) Filtering out the trub and hops before the cube, which corrects most of the over-hopping
2) "Quasi-chilling". After the cube has had about 10 min on each side to pasteurise, I sit it in a tub of cool water to chill it more rapidly. I saw a graph of isomerisation vs temperature somewhere recently that suggested an inverse-log effect, such that isomerisation is almost negligable under about 80 degrees...
So I'll keep brewing and gathering results, though the impression I have is that chilling gives more control over the flavour and quality. When I get my big water tank and pump I will probably go back to chilling. Though my laziness may have increased by then.
For me, no-chill has more benefits than drawbacks at the moment. I can get a brew done after work, and I don't need my yeast ready to brew. Gotta love that.