Shed101
Beer Dog
- Joined
- 9/4/10
- Messages
- 1,018
- Reaction score
- 6
We aren't taking into account the amount of water used to create the petrol that these guys use to send their product out to distributors then to bottle shops then for the peoples cars to drive to said bottle shop to buy the beer. Then water used to make the glass (which most of the time should be recycled anyway) to sell said beer, whereas brewing at home if you are using kegs and reusing Tallies over and over again you're far ahead. If looking at it from a cradle to grave scenario, home brewing would be more sustainable than macro.
Well I could arrange a full lifecycle analysis using simapro software, taking into account every little element if you like ... but it ain't cheap :lol:
New Belgian brewery did a decent enough carbon footprint that makes for a good read (if you're that way inclined)
I know of a carbon study comparing synthetic with real cork in Aussie wines ... the conclusion was that the customer that drives 5km to pick up a single bottle of wine does far more damage than shipping corks from all over the world, then shipping them back to Europe in the top of a bottle.