Scum Skimming

Australia & New Zealand Homebrewing Forum

Help Support Australia & New Zealand Homebrewing Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I used to but don't any more, however if I see a small amount of what I would call darker crud on the top of the wort after the break has settled down I tend to take that off with a large kitchen spoon...usually only about a spoonfull.
I think that is is just husk before it drops into the boil.

I truly believe that skimming can detract from head retention.

Cheers
 
Timely advice. Forgot about the urn I had out the back set to boil. ( To bloody busy looking on here ) No boil over but only just avoided one. So all the break material was stuck to the wall of the urn. Walked inside, read this, walked straight back out and scraped most of the crap back in. :lol:
 
I don't because I'm lazy. But also because, in my lazy way, I'd probably side with the non-skimmers amongst you anyway (Mark, etc).

There's an episode of Brewing TV I watched about wild yeast, where the brewer interviewed claimed those proteins, etc, that form the haze in brews tend to be what the yeast goes for. (He didn't whirlpool either. But then again nor do I....)

This reminds me of an analogous process in cheesemaking, when you're making a whey cheese like ricotta. When you heat whey up, just before boiling point, it will separate into different parts - the curds, which you have to filter out somehow; the whey proper (which will go from a yellowy-green to a deep green as the fatty parts separate out into curds); and the scum, a white milky froth that forms at the top. It must be largely the same stuff that forms froth at the top of the milk on cappucinos, lattes, etc. Anyway, some methods of cheesemaking require you to scoop this scum off the surface as the rest of the whey simmers away - while not scooping up the white curds. Incredibly time-consuming and it hurts your back (you spend all that time bending over the pot).

I forget what the point of this anecdote was, but as Bart Simpson said to Grampa Simpson, "Great story, old man".
 
Clive la Pensee, in one of his books of brewing, reckons (with some justification) that it's important to give the mixture a vigorous boil, since in the boil the scum will climb the sides of the pot and stick there - so the brew will be clarified that way.
 
How old are those books? I remember the name from a book or two i read over 20 years ago. Is the info still considered correct with the advances in brewing chemistry ect?
 
Still worth a read, especially if you are interested in the history of a couple of popular styles
What he is referring to are hard hop resins, these are insoluble and during the boil they will get thrown on the sides of the kettle and stick there, perhaps more important now than ever with the number of highly hopped brews being churned out.
Mark
 
Clive la Pensee is a bit of a renegade, with some idiosyncratic opinions, but then most home brewers are. So. You can take his opinions on a vigorous boil with a grain of salt. I seem to recall hearing off other brewers that the boil shouldn't be vigorous, it should be gentle (maybe to avoid over-caramelising the wort, or something?) That's probably enough material for another epic AHB thread, like the 'hydrate or not rehydrate' debate....
 
TimT said:
Clive la Pensee is a bit of a renegade, with some idiosyncratic opinions, but then most home brewers are. So. You can take his opinions on a vigorous boil with a grain of salt. I seem to recall hearing off other brewers that the boil shouldn't be vigorous, it should be gentle (maybe to avoid over-caramelising the wort, or something?) That's probably enough material for another epic AHB thread, like the 'hydrate or not rehydrate' debate....
I've heard the same with the slower vs vigorous boil. I honestly can't taste the difference. Since i have been biabing with the urn,(as opposed to the much gentiler stove top method i used previously) which either boils the **** out of the wort on 100 or higher or not at all below. Much clearer wort post boil with the urn though.
 
I did notice a difference in beers where I oversparged and had to boil the crap out of to get reasonable volume/gravity still end up with a light beer but it doesn't taste light. Normal boils, nope - nothing appreciable added by boiling hard.
 
Back
Top