Jamil says that you must flash chill to achieve the cold break. Bullshit, sorry Jamil but this is something you really need to get current with.
Sorry to pull you up there Bribie, but while you might be getting some cold break with a no chill, you aren't getting a lot of it. It's easy to make a claim in a qualitative non-lab setting, but if you look at it from a quantifiable perspective, you'll probably find something quite different.
It is a known fact of science. Hot denatured protein is "pulled apart" from its normal shape. When proteins cool slowly, they re-anneal and many (take note, I didn't say all!
![Smile :) :)]()
) return to a soluble state. When they are cooled quickly, they do not have to time to slowly reform their native structure, so they become all tangled up and form a precipitate. So a lot of slowly cooled proteins can jump back into a soluble state, and you end up with protein in your beer. A rapidly cooled solution has a lot more protein 'drop out' of solution, and never get into your beer.
There is also a state where proteins are partly re-annealed, and by post-chilling, you can get an effect where those proteins can then actually become heavy enough to drop out of solution. I think, probably, a combination of those two things is what is helping, and also with the addition of finings, this might help a bit too in a no-chill setup.
But, truth be told, it isn't 'best practice'. In the lab, I boil some protein, and then chuck it on ice to keep it denatured (I want to run the denatured protein on an acrylamide gel matrix).. if you don't do it, it can go back into solution, and it can really **** up your experiment..
Then, FWIW, a lot of the things done in home brew aren't best practice, there are a lot of factors that go into a 'good brew'. I guess I have to somehow justify the amount of effort I've put into my therminator-enabled whirlpooling setup though.. lol.
cheers