At the risk of creating another 78 pages....hellbent said:This man supports the green movement so he will probably side with the greens come election time and we all know how idiotic the greens can get with a little power.
At the risk of creating another 78 pages....hellbent said:This man supports the green movement so he will probably side with the greens come election time and we all know how idiotic the greens can get with a little power.
Not if they're all stabbing the Turkish Prison way, like in Midnight Express.maybe they will all stab each other to death
Surely you jest??Seaquebrew said:Hopefully the change will see the end of slogan chanting morons from both sides and see well thought out views articulated and debated
The other side requires change to enable this
Time for leadership not sound grab politics
Cheers
I can't see him siding with the Greens, or vice versa, not unless he needs the numbers, and that's not on the cards at the moment.<abbrev>
This new wealthy hombre has a fierce reputation for being all for Malcolm Turnbull and f*** the rest of you. This man supports the green movement so he will probably side with the greens come election time and we all know how idiotic the greens can get with a little power.
..... scary ain't it?? </abbrev>
Simples - because it is clearly idiotic to base policies on science and evidence and possibly the rather outdated notion that we are custodians of this planet for future generations, rather than schouting 'stop the boats' louder than the other mobAirgead said:As a member of the only party in parliament that bases their policies on actual science and evidence instead of slogans and knee jerk populism, could you point out exactly how the greens get idiotic with a little power?
I'd prefer if it was Christopher Pyne..Rod said:Shorton will be next
Me to. That phucking phixer..sponge said:I'd prefer if it was Christopher Pyne..
It's doubtful that Malcolm Turnbull, or anyone else for that matter, will side with the Greens any time soon after Julia Gillard's little episode with them.Airgead said:At the risk of creating another 78 pages....
As a member of the only party in parliament that bases their policies on actual science and evidence instead of slogans and knee jerk populism, could you point out exactly how the greens get idiotic with a little power?
And by counterexample, point out how the two majors don't get idiotic (with or without power..., up to you).
Edited because my fingers don;t work today
Edit edit - and why did my edit show up as a new post?
Again I ask... what policies are, as you put it "purist dribble"? What exactly is "whacked out" about them?pcmfisher said:The Greens have these policies that seem to be all nice and bubbly when they are thrown up from the sidelines, but the more they succeed, the greater focus there is on their policies, some of which are less designed to be implemented than to attract votes.
When it has found itself holding the balance of power, like with Julia's snuggly relationship, the Greens have struggled to reconcile its whacked out principles with the demands of governing.
Their policies turn out to be, you argue scientific, I say purist dribble.
Well. That was hard work, opening up the Herald scum and reading an Andrew Bolt article all in one day!manticle said:Make sure you read Bolt suggesting it was a political assassination driven by the ABC against a decent man of integrity.
Here's one of my favourites - http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/queensland-floods/coal-barons-must-pay-for-flood-damage-says-bob-brown/story-fn7iwx3v-1225989034396Airgead said:Again I ask... what policies are, as you put it "purist dribble"? What exactly is "whacked out" about them?
I suspect that by "whacked out purist dribble" you really mean - "things I don;t agree with".
Ahhhh... The Australian... for real whacked out purist dribble...TheWiggman said:
Enter your email address to join: