brettprevans
HB so good, it will raise the dead
- Joined
- 14/4/07
- Messages
- 8,267
- Reaction score
- 136
Personally I don't know why premium co's don't focus more on pushing cans. Environmentally, and cost wise it's a better option, and at the end of the day the important thing isn't the 'image' but the beer that's inside the vessel.
BRING BACK THE CAN ! (yes, I'm aware it never really left, but it's a good sounding chant)
We had a sample PET bottle sent to us last month from VISY. It had Southern Bay Brewery Bearings Draught in it.
Like you said, it's what's inside that counts. But the properties of the container also matter in terms of UV protection and oxidation. I can't imagine green plastic keeps out UV light any better than green glass does. Cans are perfect in this regard, but I'd question the environmental brownie points of aluminium given the insanely high energy costs of producing the stuff. Especially in Victoria where ALCOA locates its smelters based on political considerations, running energy across the state from our lovely brown coal burning power plants.
Nanoparticle coatings for bottles aren't far away if they aren't already being utilised.
Effectively, sunscreen for bottles.
Will make the colour of a bottle irrelevant.
"Late last year with the spate of glassings I felt I needed to start developing an alternative to glass," he said.
I'd rather drink a beer straight from a pet bottle rather than a can. Somethig about sucking on the can mouth just changes the flavour. The taste works with coke though!
If I were to pour it into a glass or cup... I couldn't give a rat's.
yeah but my pseudo hippy sister will no doubt forward me some tin-foil-hat email about it giving me cancer like she did with nano-particles in sunscreen :icon_offtopic:
Enter your email address to join: