A friend Jessica Beveridge, 17, said Daryl had been drinking at the party when he "got into some home-brew ouzo".
"He sculled the first bottle and then some people were egging him on to scull the next one," Jessica said.
Assuming the bottles were 700ml, he has already been drinking and then downs 2 bottles of spirits in quick time. It is stating the obvious but the harm caused is not the result of source but the result of quantity. It would make little difference if it was commercially made spirit - drinking that amount in that time is going to put a person at risk of serious injury.
There is a real possibility for a witchhunt to ensue regarding the source of the alcohol and we will be bombarded with all manner of ill-informed opinion from the man in the street right through to the elected legislators. The great tradgedy is amongst the calls for crackdowns, tighter policing and more fervent regulation the death of a young man will be pushed to the background.
Although the alcohol in focus is a spirit, the potential ramifications are relevant to those who make their own beer. There is still a widely held misconception that home made beer is all ultra-strong, super poor quality and has the potential to do harm to consumers even in small quantities. As Kingpython pointed out, even legal homebrewing can be drawn into these debates.
What was the outcome of the last governemet intitiative to tackle binge drinking? Increase taxation, and that was it. It may seem a long bow to draw but what next - an excise on all raw ingredients that could possibly be used in the production of alcoholic beverages as though it was already alcohol? We think grain and hop prices are high now, what could they be if the revenue raisers really get going.