What CDA category?
They need to clean up their act before they add more Americanised beer styles. <_<
GB
Wake up mate. Theres more categories than the dumpster specialty you so lively protect.
How stupid of me to forget the Americanisation....
what's to stop a homebrew community here ( or in germany,UK, or zambia ) from forming the XYZbrewing charter, and making their own set of style guidelines?.
Bloody hell. It seems like only moths ago (because it was) I was reading heated debates between US brewers as to whether BIPAs and CDAs should even be considered the similar let alone the same thing.
Glad that's all been sorted.
Boring my arse I was one of the judges in the specialty class at Vicbrew,and there were some great beers entered :beer: Some beers were knocked down in points because of things like ingredients described on the entry form not being detectable/lightly detectable.It might still have been a very nice beer,,but if you specify an ingredient ,then the judge should be able to taste it I can't remember any entries with any major faults,and some were excellent,well made examples of brewers thinking "outside the box". A great experience for any judge IMO :super:EXACTLY what Gryph said. or do i just +1
Or lets everyone enter a beer at state next year and call it a specialty, now what a great style that would be zzzzz zzzzzz zzzzz, the most boring category of beer on earth that includes EVERYTHING that doesnt fit elsewhere, a nomads category. If it was fruit/lambic, rye/spice etc etc maybe it would hold a little bit more credence in my eyes. As it is, its a dumpster.
Judges are hard to find according to this years AABC, new styles when maybe the current ones need more attention might be more worthwhile.