Measuring alcohol content!!

Australia & New Zealand Homebrewing Forum

Help Support Australia & New Zealand Homebrewing Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Mickchap

Active Member
Joined
28/4/24
Messages
35
Reaction score
3
Location
Sydney
Hi everyone. I’m a bit confused on which method to use when you measure your alcohol content. I have done a bit of research and they all say to subtract the FG from the the SG. But…. Then some say divide the answer by 7.36 and some say multiply the answer by 131.25. For example
1040-1010=30.
30 divided by 7.36 = 4.07 (first method)
30 multiplied by 131.25= 3.93 (second method)
Which one is correct????
 
The first gives the right answer in % ABV (alcohol by volume), when working in points, what most home brewers use in Australia

So both are right (ish), what most home brewers use in Australia is the first or close enough.
People tend to use 7.5 rather than 7.36 as the equation is actually polynomial rather than linear and 7.5 is closer around 5% ABV.
Standard form is
Change in gravity in points (like the 30 you have)/7.5
1.040 being 40 "points", likewise 1.010 being 10 points. Giving 30 points divided by 7.5 (or 7.36)
Second equation is when you use 1.040-1.010=0.030*131.25, not 30.
Mark
 
Hey there! It can be a bit confusing, but here's the scoop. The first method you're using, where you divide the difference in gravity (FG - SG) by 7.36, is the more common one for figuring out alcohol by volume (ABV). In the brewing world, especially in places like Australia, this method is usually preferred because it aligns with how many home brewers calculate it.

The second method, multiplying by 131.25, is a bit off for standard practice. That formula is typically applied when you work with decimal points, so you should be using the 0.030 (from 1.040 - 1.010) and then multiplying by 131.25. But honestly, sticking with the 7.36 or 7.5 divisor will get you the most accurate and widely accepted result for ABV.

So, in short, go with the first method or its close variant (7.5) for a straightforward calculation!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top