This applies to 'Palmers_Metric_RA', 'Ez_water_calculator' and 'Kaiser_water_calculator' - as far as I am aware they are the most common 'brewing water calculators.
Each of the calculators work well for determining the salt concentrations within the mash.
In addition both Kaiser and Ez also give a an 'Resulting' (overall/total) water profile, and Palmer highlights the chloride to sulfate ratio.
The reason for providing the 'total' ion concentrations is related to the recommendations in 'How to Brew' (pp 154-166) (eg: Ca 50-150, Mg<50, Na<150 etc) and also the balance of chloride to sulfate.
In the book, most ion concentration recommendations are related to taste & perception in the resulting beer (high Na, SO4 gives harsh bitterness, high Cl tastes mediciney), as is the chloride to sulfate ratio.
However, the spreadsheets calculate the 'Resulting total' on the full volume of water used, and not the batch volume, meaning they do not take into account losses in the mash or to evaporation etc.
(Losses such as cooling, trub, and dead-space are not a problem because the ppm concentration will remain the same, however, mash and evaporation losses potentially concentration the ions.)
This could mean that the 'real' total concentration of ions in the final beer may be significantly different to what the calculators suggest, so the 'real' ion concentration could be outside of what is recommended even if the calculator 'Resulting total' says it is fine.
[codebox]Simplified example:
Source water: 10ppm Calcium
Grain: 5kg Pilsner malt
Water: Strike: 20l, Sparge 20l (that equates to a pre-boil volume of ~32l and batch volume of 24l)
(40l water @ 10ppm adds 0.4g of Calcium)
Add 10g Gypsum (because our base water's 10ppm is not enough Calcium, and chloride to sulfate ratio is too malty).
(10g of Gypsum adds about 2.33g of Calcium)
The water calculators will now tell us how much Calcium is in our mash: 125ppm.
Also that the 'Resulting water profile' has 67ppm Calcium.
However, we've lost* ~8l water retained in the mash, and then another ~8l boil-off, so our 'resulting' volume is the 24 batch volume, not the 40l of water we started with.
As a consequence the salts (0.4 + 2.33 Calcium) are concentrated into the smaller volume batch volume, resulting in a 'real' Calcium concentration: 114ppm
(Which is very different to what is provided by the calculators).
* Ignoring cooling and equipment losses for the sake of simplicity.
[/codebox]
Note: I didn't sleep yet, so please feel free to correct any mistaken assumptions.
Each of the calculators work well for determining the salt concentrations within the mash.
In addition both Kaiser and Ez also give a an 'Resulting' (overall/total) water profile, and Palmer highlights the chloride to sulfate ratio.
The reason for providing the 'total' ion concentrations is related to the recommendations in 'How to Brew' (pp 154-166) (eg: Ca 50-150, Mg<50, Na<150 etc) and also the balance of chloride to sulfate.
In the book, most ion concentration recommendations are related to taste & perception in the resulting beer (high Na, SO4 gives harsh bitterness, high Cl tastes mediciney), as is the chloride to sulfate ratio.
However, the spreadsheets calculate the 'Resulting total' on the full volume of water used, and not the batch volume, meaning they do not take into account losses in the mash or to evaporation etc.
(Losses such as cooling, trub, and dead-space are not a problem because the ppm concentration will remain the same, however, mash and evaporation losses potentially concentration the ions.)
This could mean that the 'real' total concentration of ions in the final beer may be significantly different to what the calculators suggest, so the 'real' ion concentration could be outside of what is recommended even if the calculator 'Resulting total' says it is fine.
[codebox]Simplified example:
Source water: 10ppm Calcium
Grain: 5kg Pilsner malt
Water: Strike: 20l, Sparge 20l (that equates to a pre-boil volume of ~32l and batch volume of 24l)
(40l water @ 10ppm adds 0.4g of Calcium)
Add 10g Gypsum (because our base water's 10ppm is not enough Calcium, and chloride to sulfate ratio is too malty).
(10g of Gypsum adds about 2.33g of Calcium)
The water calculators will now tell us how much Calcium is in our mash: 125ppm.
Also that the 'Resulting water profile' has 67ppm Calcium.
However, we've lost* ~8l water retained in the mash, and then another ~8l boil-off, so our 'resulting' volume is the 24 batch volume, not the 40l of water we started with.
As a consequence the salts (0.4 + 2.33 Calcium) are concentrated into the smaller volume batch volume, resulting in a 'real' Calcium concentration: 114ppm
(Which is very different to what is provided by the calculators).
* Ignoring cooling and equipment losses for the sake of simplicity.
[/codebox]
Note: I didn't sleep yet, so please feel free to correct any mistaken assumptions.