Thanks guys.
Bizier said:
Also having your yeast ferment that **** in a few days will help, so get it primed, viable and angry.
^This is something another brewer and I were talking about recently...why is it that we often need two weeks for a complete ferment and for the yeast to 'clean up' when (albeit radically different environment and equipment) commercials will pitch and manage rates to have the thing done in a few days? (rhetorical question, I've read 'Yeast').
I am going back to dry yeasts exclusively for a while and will be using two packs for anything over 1.055ish (FFS yeast thread aside)...I did this yesterday in an AIPA, rehydrated one pack and the other pack just got sprinkled in.
jyo said:
As has been suggested, try a few no chills consecutively and see how you go.
^Yes, I think I'll have to give this a go...I have two empty FWK cubes that have been sitting around sealed with napisan in them.
MaltyHops said:
What if you go back to using glad wrap and only ferment enough wort to fill half (or less) of the fermenter so there's no way the krausen will reach the top ... don't bother taking readings at all, let it keep going for three or four weeks when it should well and truly have finished fermenting and see if you still get unwelcome guests growing without having exposed the wort to air (post pitching).
Was the tap on th eBunnings fermenter also new? Did you take apart the tap (if it's not a new tap) for claning/sanitising? Is there much air movement around where fermenter is?
^Yes, everything was new. I am a rigorous cleaner...that is why I am so shocked and upset by this spate...I am now convinced it is airborne. I usually take two gravity readings, the second is done on the day that I keg/bottle.
Going back to dry yeasts for a while so won't need the extra headspace for my selection. Of course I hope you were suggesting to brew over two fermenters and not reduce the volume I'm brewing haha!
I really think the only time it is 'exposed' to air is during the chilling process...ironic given that I am chilling in order to pitch the yeast ASAP.
Maxt said:
The only way to nail this is to change one variable at a time and do some small batch test brews of something simple like a pale ale. Do one batch without chiller, see if it infected. If still infected do one batch with a borrowed kettle to eliminate that. If still infected change your transfer hoses/pumps. Another simple experiment would be to brew as usual, but ferment somewhere else (pitch yeast there as well). I have had my share of infections but usually due to yeast lag...I was in a club with one brewer who had a recurring infection which turned out to be the kettle tap...do you/canyou run the boiling wort through it for 15 mins while the chiller is in before flameout? (I did see you had boiled the tap earlier). Good luck, it's heartbreaking to tip beer.
Thanks Maxt. I am BIAB/single vessel so only really have the option to pull the tap apart each time.
I think I'll no-chill a batch tomorrow (belg pale ale with t58) and report back in a few weeks. I have another brand new, unused bunnings fermenter and tap which I'll just dose with boiling water, then star san and seal until I pour off the no-chill chilled wort into it.
I really appreciate the support of the site.
I used to be a bit snobby when I saw infection threads - like I take your point about technique Bizier but in now 8 going on 9 years of brewing this is the first time I've come across something as persistent as this (I have cleaned most of my brewery area and equipment with chlorine bleach, boiling water, then a sod perc/met mix, boiling water, star san...if it is in the equipment then I would suggest that it is the key to the next stage of human evolution and I should ingest it haha).
But this **** really is heartbreaking, mostly because the lesson that I will hopefully learn from this has yet to reveal itself and doesn't appear to be a simple thing like mash temp or ferment temp etc.