Let's not forget the basics of economics- the value of a product is what consumers are willing to pay. I think this is reflected in the prices of Dan Murphy's, and if the small retailers can't keep up, then they should give up and go get a job at Dan's. If, however, the service at the little retailers is worth an extra couple of bucks, then stick with them. If enough people agree with you, then the small retailer will survive and Dan's will learn a lesson.
Having said that, I think that the range at Dan's is still pretty good; bottle shops can only fit so many products on their shelves and the big suppliers pay good money to have their products on the best shelves (centre of the aisle, eye level). That's why most beers in liquorland and safeway (woolworths) liquor is either made, distributed or imported by Foster's or tooheys, and half the wines are Foster's too. It really doesn't matter if you can't get your favourite beer at every bottle shop; as long as you can get it somewhere you're set.
And redbeard- from my observation, most big liquor chains do customise stock for the local area. For example, the bottlo where I worked was in a feral, bogan-filled suburb so we always had plenty of vb, woodstock and cheap goon in stock
Barfridge, in the wine industry it goes further back than that- it's the grape growers that are getting screwed. When dan's is selling cleanskin wines for $1.99 a bottle, there's no way that the growers are breaking even, they may as well let the fruit just rot on the vines.
Anyway, enough rambling about wine and economics, especially since this forum is about beer... thanks for reading
