Not a worry mate. 1 point over guidelines?
Best thing about comps really (besides if you are lucky enough to place in one) is that good beers will always stand out, as will bad beers. Coming middle of the road may be disappointing in some respects and the feedback may not always be great or make sense (you try sampling 25 belgian 7-10+% strong ales, one after the other and supplying thoughtful, accurate feeedback at 3.30 pm) but it will show you that you are making decent beer. Winning or placing probably means you are making or at least are capable of making fantastic beer and coming low means you may have some issues to attend to.
Not the be all and end all - brew for yourself and your friends/family if warranted but a bit of fun from time to time.
My advice though, contrary to many, is put in what you are proud of or what you feel represents you. Don't enter what you know is shit beer unless you are genuinely confused as to what makes it shit and hope a more expert palate will make sense of it. People say 'enter just for the feedback' but the feedback isn't always great or accurate or even sensible. Can be useful, can be rubbish.
Some of the feedback I got from the recent National comp was terrible with a few sheets not even showing the judge's names (some were detailed and fantastic too so it all balances out)