Fro-Daddy
Well-Known Member
Any pics of the internals of the Ultra Flo? Be interesting to see if it is the same as the Ultra or Inter.
Any pics of the internals of the Ultra Flo? Be interesting to see if it is the same as the Ultra or Inter.
Met Brad down at KK in his pocket he had an old Ventmatic tap which he found here in Melbourne it had been in constant commercial use since 2003 he bought it back, he told me in 15 years the 'O' rings had never been changed. The Ultratap is very similar but a bigger shuttle again than the Ventmatic.I was pretty intrigued to find a 13 year old post with a very familiar looking design:
![]()
Ventmatic - Where To Get A Good Deal
Lotsa references to old mate 'Brad' as seen in the Keg-King video.
Promo looks good but it always bugs me when marketing videos like this use that term - "laminar flow". ANY good tap has laminar flow, if they didn't, you'd get a glass full of foam.
I'm waiting on my Ultratap now so I can do a proper side-by-side with the Intertap.
I know it's a legitimate term, I didn't say it wasn't, my point is that its use in describing a non flow-control tap is unnecessary and seems to exist only as marketing jargon. If by "unlicensed copy" you mean an Intertap then I'm not sure what you mean there either, it pours equally well (since laminar flow is a fairly standard feature of a decent tap), and again it's venturing into off-topic territory about the patent debate - which again, I'm sure, if KegKing believed there was such a claim they would make it themselves.Actually, the interference with laminar flow is why a flow control tap will produce more foam at wide open than an ultratap or the unlicenced copy.
It is a legitimate term and theory in fluid dynamics (the science of liquid and gas flow.)
Nope it's not the same as the ultratap, I did find a pic that had a nylon seal instead of the orings. Otherwise it looks like the ultraflo and ultratap are a clone of the original ventmatic, which is a copy of the perlick? I think the perlick was the first to use the forward sealing method. I've been trying to get a time line on things but it's a bit tricky to find accurate info. It looks like brad designed the first ventmatic but ventmatic own the patents. Then law suits started. Haven't found out what the it come was, this happened back in 2004.
One thing I'd like to know is can that seal be replaced on the shuttle if it gets worn?
I was pretty intrigued to find a 13 year old post with a very familiar looking design:
![]()
Ventmatic - Where To Get A Good Deal
Lotsa references to old mate 'Brad' as seen in the Keg-King video.
Actually, the interference with laminar flow is why a flow control tap will produce more foam at wide open than an ultratap or the unlicenced copy.
It is a legitimate term and theory in fluid dynamics (the science of liquid and gas flow.)
It's the same spring for Ultra and Inter right? That longer throw makes it sound like it should use it's own spring.One thing I noticed straight away is the ultratap has a lot longer throw on the handle, not sure if that's good or not, and most times the spring will not push it off properly. And it doesn't feel overly smooth, it sort of scrapes open and close.
It's the same spring for Ultra and Inter right? That longer throw makes it sound like it should use it's own spring.
Promo looks good but it always bugs me when marketing videos like this use that term - "laminar flow". ANY good tap has laminar flow, if they didn't, you'd get a glass full of foam.
I don’t think that is quite right as Brad publically said to a bunch of brewers last week that he had patents back in 2003 covering Australia and that the only one in the world who could use his patents now were MCH Keg King and he came out here to clear all this up.I own 3 Intertap taps, bought from Keg-King before the KK/KL split. There are two versions of the springs for the Intertaps, the big one works the other is too short/weak to properly close the tap.
Even with the big spring it kinda scraped when opening and closing like you say. I ended up not using the auto-close springs at all.
View attachment 113408 View attachment 113409 View attachment 113410
On the patent topic there is a thread either here or at homebrewtalk that covers the issue in some detail, there are also some additional details on Brulosophy. There were/are no patents in Australia covering perlic/VentMatic forward sealing taps, however the US importer of Intertap taps had to remove Intertaps from sale for a period of about 6 months because the VentMatic patent holder (Bradford Amidzich) claimed that the InterTap infringed on his patent. Intertap came to an agreement with VentMatic and is now registered under VentMatic patents US6457614, US6626420, US7077299.
It appears Ultratap is using the same patents in their design and has one of the patent numbers (7077299) stamped on the body.
My Intertap taps (no flow control) all have a non-laminated flow if I open the tap too fast, if I open it slowly it is perfectly laminated so it is not just an issue for flow control taps.
The non-laminated flow creates about twice as much head as I want. I don't have a photo of this but I may try to take one.
I don’t think that is quite right as Brad publically said to a bunch of brewers last week that he had patents back in 2003 covering Australia and that the only one in the world who could use his patents now were MCH Keg King and he came out here to clear all this up.
I don’t think that is quite right as Brad publically said to a bunch of brewers last week that he had patents back in 2003 covering Australia and that the only one in the world who could use his patents now were MCH Keg King and he came out here to clear all this up.
Not for that one. KK had several sessions for people with Brad and his explanation on getting beer from keg to glass are very enlightening.Awes
Awesome, you were there part of Melbourne Brewers? I wasn't able to make it down for the meeting that night, was hoping to stock up on a few items with the discount.
That'd help, wouldn't it..Sorry to be niave but which is which? Left ultra tap? Right intertap?
That'd help, wouldn't it..
Left is Ultratap. Right is Intertap.
No bias nor affiliation, I've gotten involved in this thread in response to what appeared to be a significant bias and potential misrepresentation from a couple of posters in particular (on both sides of the fence - nobody is innocent here). I want to present a neutral view of the matter.Cheers.
I don't know anything about taps but it does appear the ultra tap isn't the bees knees.
Do you have a horse in the race? Or a bias?
No bias nor affiliation, I've gotten involved in this thread in response to what appeared to be a significant bias and potential misrepresentation from a couple of posters in particular (on both sides of the fence - nobody is innocent here). I want to present a neutral view of the matter.
It would help if other Ultratap owners could post photos of their own taps in order to confirm the veneer issue isn't something I can be accused of fabricating.
So you are worried about what you received, then send it back if you are not happy. I am very happy with mine, very rarely I will use them, I will only have them on my minikegs so not be getting much use but I do know that people not experienced pouring themselves a beer from a keg will not have a problem.The question that should be asked WEAL is why you're still posting conjecture.
I don't care which factory they're made in, I care about what I and others receive. And there's a difference, in both look and feel.
I'm not worried about what I received. I'm doing what the thread intends, which is comparing taps. Unless you have a comparison to make yourself, or an otherwise on topic contribution, I'm not sure what you're doing posting in this thread.So you are worried about what you received, then send it back if you are not happy. I am very happy with mine, very rarely I will use them, I will only have them on my minikegs so not be getting much use but I do know that people not experienced pouring themselves a beer from a keg will not have a problem.