Except for the black ones B)mje1980 said:Seals are grey and don't have arms and legs. Don't lay on surfboards and swim on the surface. Nice try though![]()
Damn.timmyf said:.
Do I support a shark cull? Not at this point. Should the option be open for debate? Of course. This how negations work.
You're one serious piece of work...Ducatiboy stu said:Damn.
Didnt realise that all this could sorted by just asking the sharks if we could negotiate a deal where they stopped attacking people in the ocean
I didnt actually mention chummanticle said:(except stu who thinks they dress like seals and coat themselves in chum).
And your point being what exactly ?timmyf said:You're one serious piece of work...
Completely agree. But there is only a certain amount of risk that is acceptable without mitigation. And when that risk jumps from remote or very unlikely to probable, it's time to start asking questionsmanticle said:If someone goes bushwalking in long grass in hot weather, they may get bitten by a snake. Most serious bushwalkers probably know and accept the risk and take some precautions. Might still get bitten, won't blame them, won't napalm the grass either.
Hardly hyperbole, just statistics. If I said that 'you cant even go into the water these days without being maimed or killed', then you might have a point.manticle said:Further, using terms like 400% increase when you're talking about numbers like 12 a year is hyperbole.
Ask away. Trying to kill all the sharks is a blatantly absurd answer though.timmyf said:Completely agree. But there is only a certain amount of risk that is acceptable without mitigation. And when that risk jumps from remote or very unlikely to probable, it's time to start asking questions
Nah. If I fell over once in july, then twice in august, that's a 100% increase. If I told a statistician, I can imagine the withering look on their face would make me feel as insignificant as the numbers. So many factors could explain a jump from 3-12. I doubt the evil shark bosses having an AGM or offering commissions on maiming is one of them.Hardly hyperbole, just statistics. If I said that 'you cant even go into the water these days without being maimed or killed', then you might have a point.
If there is no other sensible solution then... Yes. Is the alternative acceptable to you?Ducatiboy stu said:So we just go around killing animals that start being harmfull to us. Is that the solution when the stats get a bit high
Oh, there is an alternative, but it would interfere with your lifestyle and leisure.timmyf said:If there is no other sensible solution then... Yes. Is the alternative acceptable to you?
What's the alternative? That sometimes people are injured or die? You mean to eliminate that from the world?timmyf said:If there is no other sensible solution then... Yes. Is the alternative acceptable to
No. But the stats are reasonably good. I know heaps of people who have been in he ocean and are still alive.VP Brewing said:Has anyone recorded the number of people that went swimming in the ocean and didn't get attacked by a shark?
I suggest you dont go surfing then.droid said:sharks hate shampoo and I'm bald now that's some bad luck right there
Cars kill more people every year than every type of animal put together. We don't have to all drive cars every day but we accept the risk and do it. No one wants to ban cars.timmyf said:Completely agree. But there is only a certain amount of risk that is acceptable without mitigation. And when that risk jumps from remote or very unlikely to probable, it's time to start asking questions
Hardly hyperbole, just statistics. If I said that 'you cant even go into the water these days without being maimed or killed', then you might have a point.