Yeah, I get what you're saying Malted. My unconventional brewing methods mean I get better utilization from my hops.
Oh I see, you brew more than 20 Gallons and have forgotten the details behind brewing 15 Litres?
Either that or you can get 114.4% utilisation for a 15L batch (this being the utilisation in BS that gives me 40 IBU's for 15L of 1.060 with 20g of 17% AA at 20 minutes). The OP said he actually brewed 20L but I am sticking with 15L to match the previous examples. I will also use 17% alpha acid hops in my examples just because I am feeling generous. For this same reason I am going to use the BJCP
minimum IBU value for an IPA (40 IBU's). (Note also that we don't actually get 100% utilisation of Alpha Acids, IIRC this 100% in BS represents 100% of the expected utilisation, rather than actual utilisation of AA).
Palmer's
table shows an actual utilisation of 21.1% of AA's for hops boiled for 60 minutes in 1.060 wort. If those hops are boiled for an extra 60 minutes (120 in total) then the utilisation only rises to 23%. I am also led to believe that for every 10oC drop in temp below 100oC that isomerisation of Alpha Acids is halved (and therefore potential derived bittering is lowered by an amount)
Yes you will get extra bittering if you left your hops in the kettle for an extended period of time after flameout but the rate at which bittering compounds form is reduced as the wort cools. With a very large kettle it would naturally cool slower due to a larger thermal mass. 15L is probably not considered a large thermal mass.
If we calculate the required utilisation for an IBU of 40 from 20g of 17% AA hops in 15L of 1.60 wort
ibu's = (grams x AA% ) x Utilization % x 10
--------------------------------------------
volume
Where X is Utilisation %
40 = (20 x 17) x X x10
---------------------
15
X = 40 x 15
---------------
20 x 17 x 10
X =
17.6% Utilisation
Looking at Palmers
Table 7 - Utilization as a function of Boil Gravity and Time (In previous link)
our 20g of 17% AA hops could give us 40 IBU's into 15L of 1.060 wort if we boiled them for about 36 minutes (Note: the OP said 20 mins). Also note, 20 minutes only gives us 12.8% utilisation.
If you did not chill your wort and left it to sit, bittering compounds would continue to be formed. However, it is logical that your wort would cool by itself (rate dependent upon things such as ambient conditions and equipment etc) and thus reduce it's potential for gathering bittering compounds. You would need the wort to stay at 100oC to continue, or increase from a 17.6% utilisation. We might conclude that as temperature drops, both isomerisation and utilisation drops. Ergo at a lower temperature, a longer period of time than 16 minutes (above our 20 minutes) would be required to give the equivalent utilisation and IBU's.
I note with my 50L system that as soon as I turn off the heat the wort temp will drop to about 96oC in the absence of an external heat source, when I whirlpool it will often drop another 6-5oc. It is not uncommon for my wort to be down to 90oC just by turning off the heat and giving it a stir. I would thus expect isomerisation of AA to be halved in a very short period of time after the boil time has finished (in my system).
Perhaps your unconventional brewing is that you turn off the heat to the insulated kettle, put a lid on it and walk away to come back the next day? Therefore your wort would stay in the high 90's (oC) for an extended period of time after flameout. Therefore you are getting higher apparent bittering in your wort than one might expect from a 20 minute addition? I have heard of people no chilling in the brew kettle and thus it is questionable as to whether this is unconventional.
I would contend that it is possible for you to get
'higher' utilisation rates of hops than I do, since I don't know what brewing vessels you use etc or what sort of brewing witchcraft you may be practising. I could NOT say that they might be
'better' utilisation rates. I would think your unconventional brewing as outlined in the paragraph above might well drive out flavour and aroma compounds (since it appears to be geared more towards bittering) and this might well suit the production of beers that you like. It probably would not suit the styles of beers I like.
Now if your brewing methods are 'unconventional', why would you assume that everyone else uses them? This seemed to be the inference from your initial statement to the OP. By definition, they probably would not be unconventional if everyone uses them. So if you are using the same brewing methods as everyone else, what sort of brewing witchcraft would give us 40 IBU's from 20g of 17% AA hops at 20 mins (reserving the other 20g for dry hopping) in 1.060 wort?
Edit: formatting.