I know - I was just raising the point for consideration. I've now experienced three different floor malted malts - Fawcett's (Maris Otter), Tuckers (varieties unsure - probably Regina and/or Halcyon) and Powell's and
in my opinion the floor malting makes a bigger difference in general than the barley variety. I.e. I think the benefits of Fawcetts Maris Otter over JW Trad are at least as much to do with Fawcett's traditional floor malting as the much vaunted variety.
[post="56385"][/post]
[/quote]
No worries Sean. Hope my post didn't come across as smart ar*ed, I'm genuinely interested in getting to the bottom of it. The only really detailed grain specific info I've got here at home is in Noonan's
New Brewing Lager Beer where he goes into the techniques of growing and malting barley to some extent. I'll go back and check it tomorrow and see if it sheds any extra light on the subject. If so I'll post. What I do know is that there are obvious flavour differences and I choose my grain bills accordingly. As to exactly
why, well I'm learning. You are probably right in terms of the floor malting as it is an obvious difference.
Getting back to the original question though, I'd still put in a vote for the JW Pils malt as a good one to buy, and plan to do so again myself. The bit about the extra 'hardness' of the grain is just an observation on my part having worked my way through two bags of different malts since buying my Marga mill - the Pils malt seems tougher to crack than the MO... Might just be my mill I guess but I don't think so.
I've asked my HBS to get some Powell's in and he's planning to but freight is a killer, so I doubt it'll be $35 a bag

I'm keen to try it. Despite my liking for MO I'd rather support a local. If it is good then I'lll definitely use it in the future.
Shawn :beer: