Fair point Dave. I was getting more at the point of yeast are still sensitive to light, would that be right/fair to say?Airgead said:Unlikely. Moderate darkness the UV would be negligible. That article is talking about something on the order of direct sunshine.
More likely you just had very little yeast present in the bottles and/or the yeast was stressed/unhealthy/exhausted/nutrient deprived and just took a long time to ferment the priming sugar.
Cheers
Dave
Could exposure to UV light be the answer to a sweet cider?BottloBill said:Just a snippet of something I have been reading recently. I bottled some cider more than a few months ago in green bottles and kept them in moderate darkness and took at least 10 weeks before I got any fizz from them. I think the following may explain my problem.....
i am hoping that this is what happened to my latest batch, left it in the fermenter too long before bottling (after bulk priming) and now there's minimal yeast doing the carbonation... 3 weeks and still just a slight 'pfft' on opening...Airgead said:More likely you just had very little yeast present in the bottles and/or the yeast was stressed/unhealthy/exhausted/nutrient deprived and just took a long time to ferment the priming sugar.
Cheers
Dave
mine is sure sweet!!!superstock said:
I've a UV lamp that's part of my crack detector. Nexy time I make a cider I might sacrifice a few clear bottles, subject them to a couple of hours of UV and leave them in a box to see if any bottle bombs develope.Airgead said:Could be. Would need to be poetry intense uv to reliably kill ask the yeast and prevent further fermentation. Not due it's doable on a hone scale. Not easily anyway. But it is used at utility scale for water purification so would work in theory.
Autocorrect on my phone hates me.manticle said:Poetry like haiku or more like iambic pentameter?
Enter your email address to join: