Recent content by Parks

They're pretty shit for sure. If you invert them and put liquid CO2 into the regulator you have to take the bulb off and start with a fresh one. Even when they work they are very unresponsive - go from no pressure to way too much.

YES PLEASE!

Pick me ma lord!

To my taste it needed just a little more bitterness as the intense malt lingered a bit too much. I reckon it would be amazing in 12 months though.

Also lol @ the terms. *Max disc $500 which is the discount on a $5000 item.

What a steal

MEMEMEMEMEME! Pick me ma lord!

I was charged with the designated driver duties for Xmas lunch so this beer was my reward when I got home. Another really enjoyable and dangerously sessionable beer.

I actually really enjoyed this beer. If you told me it was a traditional pilsner I would say get fucked. But if you told me it was the golden piss of a Buddhist Monk I would say **** yes!

I’ll share it with you [emoji1305]

It really depends on where in the process it occurs. If it’s the whole batch then look at oxygen introduced toward the end of primary or in bottling. An individual bottle may have been the last bottle filled or something that managed extra O2. I’m really just guessing though.

The common descriptors are papery, cardboard, possibly dark fruit accompanying. I find a real musty thing that’s hard to describe. The only way to know is to take two PET of the same beer, drink half of one, then tomorrow do a side-by-side with the second half and a fresh bottle.

Delicious beer! Lovely spice and phenols, quite lively which stirred up the yeast a bit which seemed to increase the creamy mouthfeel. Great beer Al

2. MadPierre’s Robust Porter. Good roast but some pretty evident oxidation unfortunately. Hopefully it’s just the one bottle.